During one of the Einstein-Bohr debates, Einstein proposed a thought experiment that would prove that one could measure time and energy simultaneously. It's known as the Einstein box:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr–Einstein_debates#Einstein.27s_second_criticism

Then Bohr came up with a resolution (invoking the gravitational time dilation!) which is described e.g. there on Wikipedia. I also have it in my book, but I don't understand it. I have two questions:

1. Why isn't the explaination as simple as:

If the emission time of the photon is measured with uncertainty Δt, the change in vertical momentum that could have been introduced to the photon by gravity is maximally:

Δp = mg Δt

(where [itex] m = E/c^2 [/itex])

On the other hand the uncertainty in the vertical position Δz of the box (and hence, of the photon), corresponds to the uncertainty in the potential energy:

ΔE = mg Δz

Then since: [itex] Δz Δp ≥ \hbar [/itex] then also:

[itex] (\frac{ΔE}{mg})(mg Δt) ≥ \hbar → ΔE Δt ≥ \hbar [/itex]

2. This must be wrong somehow, otherwise it wouldn't take Bohr a whole day to come up with a solution! Could you explain to me Bohr's argument in more detail? It seems to me like the gravitational time dilation would be a second order uncertainty, since it's an uncertainty in the uncertainty of the emission time.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Bohr's response to the Einstein box

Loading...

Similar Threads for Bohr's response Einstein | Date |
---|---|

A Bohr's complementarity is completed with entanglement? | Mar 17, 2018 |

B Where Can I find the Einstein vs. Bohr Full Debates | Feb 26, 2018 |

B Question on the Bohr atomic model and energy | Jun 29, 2017 |

A A question about linear response and conductivity | May 26, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**