Boltzmann factor and partition function

Click For Summary
The Boltzmann factor, P_j = (1/Z)e^(-βE_j), represents the probability distribution of a system occupying a specific microstate j. The confusion arises from the interpretation of this probability in systems with multiple particles, as the sum of probabilities across all microstates must equal one. The partition function, Z = ∑_i g_i e^(-E_i/k_BT), incorporates the degeneracy factor g_i, which accounts for the number of microstates corresponding to a particular energy level. Clarification is needed on the role of g_i, as it relates to the distribution of states in the context of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping statistical mechanics and the behavior of systems at thermal equilibrium.
Mjdgard
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I got a problem by finding an proper explanation.

The Boltzmann factor is defined as
P_j=\frac{1}{Z}e^{-\beta E_j}
I know, this is a probability distribution. but what exactly does it mean?

Wikipedia says: "The probability Pj that the system occupies microstate j" (link)
But that doesen make sense to me. cos \sum_i is equal to 1.
That would only make sense if i look at ONLY 1 particle and not a system with n particles IMHO.


Then i got this Partition function Z.
It is defined as Z=\sum_i g_i e^{- \frac{E_i}{k_BT}
with a factor gi denoting the degeneracy of energy states.

What is gi? i thought it's the number of different states in this energy level. but that's not likely cos in the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution there's no pauli law...

:cry:

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it didn't add up to 1, then it wouldn't be a probability now, would it? :-p

Anyways, the quote talks about the microstates of the system: in other words, it would include something about the state of each individual component of the system.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K