Bone density for a single individual

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mohd Abdullah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the variability of bone density measurements among individuals, particularly focusing on the bone mineral density (BMD) of Black men compared to other ethnic groups. The referenced study reports a group average BMD of 1.25 ± 0.10 g/cm² for Black men, but individual measurements may vary significantly. Participants express skepticism about the reliability of the study due to the deceased nature of the subjects and the lack of detailed statistical treatment. The conversation highlights the need for further research into bone density across different ethnicities and lifestyles, emphasizing that individual measurements cannot be directly inferred from group averages.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bone mineral density (BMD) and its measurement techniques.
  • Familiarity with statistical concepts such as mean, standard deviation, and confidence intervals.
  • Knowledge of DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry) scans and their application in measuring bone density.
  • Awareness of anthropological factors affecting bone density, including diet and environmental influences.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the methodology of DXA scans for accurate bone density measurement.
  • Explore studies on the impact of ethnicity on bone density, focusing on individual case studies.
  • Investigate the effects of lifestyle factors, such as exercise and nutrition, on bone density variations.
  • Review literature on statistical analysis in medical studies to understand confidence limits and their implications.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in anthropology, healthcare professionals, and individuals studying the effects of ethnicity on bone health will benefit from this discussion. It is particularly relevant for those examining the nuances of bone density measurements and their implications in clinical practice.

Mohd Abdullah
Messages
99
Reaction score
3
Hey guys!

I find this link http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/71/6/1392/T3.expansion.html to be interesting and I doubt a little bit about the statement that said "Blacks have more bone density than Whites". It shows the measurements of bone densities of 67 Black and White cadavers. The measurements of bone density for a group of Black men are 1.25 ± 0.10 and 1.30 ± 0.12, so what is the measurement of bone density (BMD) for a single Black man? Is it just the same as the measurements for the group of Black men or slightly different?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Mohd Abdullah said:
(BMD) for a single Black man?
Whatever it happens to be. Statistics for a group say nothing about a particular individual measurement beyond giving you a probability of finding a value for a measured variable that is in the range found for the group.
 
Bystander said:
Whatever it happens to be. Statistics for a group say nothing about a particular individual measurement beyond giving you a probability of finding a value for a measured variable that is in the range found for the group.

So the bone density measurement for a single Black man could be less than 1.25 ± 0.10 and 1.30 ± 0.12 or more? Do anyone on this forum have measured or know the measurement of bone density of a single Black man?
 
Could be less, could be more, correct.

You'll notice the subjects were deceased,
Mohd Abdullah said:
measurements of bone densities of 67 Black and White cadavers

meaning the specimens are part of an anthropological collection which may or may not have sufficient provenance to allow conclusions regarding diet and environment. For all anyone knows, we're looking at accumulations of lead paint from a century ago.
 
Bystander said:
Could be less, could be more, correct.

But I think the bone density measurement of a single African man should be around the bone density measurement for the group of Black men, not exceeding the range of 1.30 ± 0.12 and not less than it, right? Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Bystander said:
You'll notice the subjects were deceased,meaning the specimens are part of an anthropological collection which may or may not have sufficient provenance to allow conclusions regarding diet and environment. For all anyone knows, we're looking at accumulations of lead paint from a century ago.

Hmm so if I am not mistaken, this study can't be take 100% and it could be unreliable.
 
Mohd Abdullah said:
1.30 ± 0.12 and
The table doesn't state a particular statistical treatment. We can assume the ± 0.12 as the sigma values for the distribution; confidence limits on medical or nutritional studies? I have no idea. Translation: ~ 70% of the sample group lies within ± 0.12 of 1.30.

If you are interested in bone mineral content and density, you will have to hunt down a lot more studies than just this one to develop any idea of whether there is any difference, let alone what it might be.
 
Bystander said:
The table doesn't state a particular statistical treatment. We can assume the ± 0.12 as the sigma values for the distribution; confidence limits on medical or nutritional studies? I have no idea. Translation: ~ 70% of the sample group lies within ± 0.12 of 1.30.

That's why I also tend to confuse about this research. Maybe I should asked doctors on a medical science or health forum? Are there any doctors here? But I think the total body bone density of a single Black man should be around the range of 1.30 ± 0.12 I guess.

Bystander said:
If you are interested in bone mineral content and density, you will have to hunt down a lot more studies than just this one to develop any idea of whether there is any difference, let alone what it might be.

The majority of other articles about racial bone density that I find on Google only provided total hip and femoral neck bone density, this is the only article (so far) that mention the total body bone density. But I still can't find the total body bone density of a single Black man, but I have find several total body bone mineral density measurements of a single White man and an Asian man.
 
@Mohd Abdullah -- Can you say more about your interest in this? Are you writing a survey paper, or otherwise doing research into this subject?

Depending on the context of your questions, you may need to take other variables into account. For example, the bone density of an individual with osteoporosis will be quite different from the bone density of a healthy life-long athlete and weight lifter...
 
berkeman said:
@Mohd Abdullah -- Can you say more about your interest in this? Are you writing a survey paper, or otherwise doing research into this subject?

Depending on the context of your questions, you may need to take other variables into account. For example, the bone density of an individual with osteoporosis will be quite different from the bone density of a healthy life-long athlete and weight lifter...

I am doing research about the variety of bone density among different ethnics. If you are googling on Google the statements that you will always find is "Blacks have more bone density than Whites", "Asians have the less dense bone", etc. but when I looking into some DXA scan results of some single White, Black and Asian individual, actually Whites can have denser bone than Blacks and vice versa, and last night I find someone pic on some forum showing his bone density at 1.400 g/cm2 or more and he is an Asian. Normally, the normal bone density usually measured at 1.200 g/cm2 or slightly more.

Btw, can we find the total body BMD (bone density) of a Black bodybuilder? The Black bodybuilder have a total BMC (bone mineral content) of 4149 g and he is 6 foot tall and weigh 251 pound.
 
  • #10
Mohd Abdullah said:
variety of bone density among different ethnics.
Looking at BMD as a function of ethnicity rather of lifestyle, diet/nutrition is probably a lost cause without samples from all ethnic groups from all lifestyles and all nutritional/diet histories.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #11
Image-4.jpg


Alright, I am confused because this man's pelvis area is only 271.07 cm2 while his head is 278.77. While it is clearly in the image that his pelvis is wider than his head but have comparable height. Can anyone explain this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
15K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K