Books/courses that reflect Gian Carlo Rota's thoughts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a concise and relevant resource for studying differential equations (DE) that aligns with specific educational goals outlined in a referenced document. A participant expresses frustration with lengthy texts like Tenenbaum and Pollard, fearing they may contain outdated content. Another contributor defends the value of such resources, emphasizing their accessibility and variety of problems, while also suggesting they can serve as supplementary materials. Alternatives are proposed, including a legal PDF of an introductory DE textbook and a recommendation for nonlinear dynamics by Strogatz, along with a relevant online course. The conversation highlights the balance between practical problem-solving and theoretical understanding in the study of differential equations, especially for part-time students managing full-time work.
imwhatim
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary: Books that reflect: https://web.williams.edu/Mathematics/lg5/Rota.pdf

I'm looking for a book or course that distills the subject of differential equations (DE) according to these 10 points : https://web.williams.edu/Mathematics/lg5/Rota.pdf
I'm a part-time student working full-time, I cannot go through a 800 page book like Tenenbaum and Pollard only to find out at the end that most content is obsolete. I understand that any practice is good practice for gaining mathematical maturity, but I'll take that practice from elsewhere. :biggrin:

Regards,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
imwhatim said:
I cannot go through a 800 page book like Tenenbaum and Pollard only to find out at the end that most content is obsolete
I can assure you the content isn't obsolete. It's actually a really accessible book for DE with a good variety of problems, IMO. It can always be used as a supplement.

I bought it for $24 Cdn. on Amazon in 2016. The fact that it's listed at $54 now is an absolute travesty.
 
imwhatim said:
I understand that any practice is good practice for gaining mathematical maturity, but I'll take that practice from elsewhere.
Then I would suggest doing so - much of any introductory book like this: https://www.math.unl.edu/~jlogan1/PDFfiles/New3rdEditionODE.pdf (legal copy) is about learning to manually solve differential equations that Mathematica can solve equally well. Do you consider that obsolete? If so, you might want to move on to more formal stuff in other fields and then maybe go through the excellent theoretical book by V I Arnold

If you want something you can chew on now, you could look at nonlinear dynamics by strogatz or this course: https://www.complexityexplorer.org/...athematical-and-computational-approaches-2024
 
You have enough time to study if you work.

I typically tell students only work the hours needed to survive and nothing more.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
17K
Back
Top