Books/courses that reflect Gian Carlo Rota's thoughts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a concise and relevant resource for studying differential equations (DE) that aligns with specific educational goals outlined in a referenced document. A participant expresses frustration with lengthy texts like Tenenbaum and Pollard, fearing they may contain outdated content. Another contributor defends the value of such resources, emphasizing their accessibility and variety of problems, while also suggesting they can serve as supplementary materials. Alternatives are proposed, including a legal PDF of an introductory DE textbook and a recommendation for nonlinear dynamics by Strogatz, along with a relevant online course. The conversation highlights the balance between practical problem-solving and theoretical understanding in the study of differential equations, especially for part-time students managing full-time work.
imwhatim
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary: Books that reflect: https://web.williams.edu/Mathematics/lg5/Rota.pdf

I'm looking for a book or course that distills the subject of differential equations (DE) according to these 10 points : https://web.williams.edu/Mathematics/lg5/Rota.pdf
I'm a part-time student working full-time, I cannot go through a 800 page book like Tenenbaum and Pollard only to find out at the end that most content is obsolete. I understand that any practice is good practice for gaining mathematical maturity, but I'll take that practice from elsewhere. :biggrin:

Regards,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
imwhatim said:
I cannot go through a 800 page book like Tenenbaum and Pollard only to find out at the end that most content is obsolete
I can assure you the content isn't obsolete. It's actually a really accessible book for DE with a good variety of problems, IMO. It can always be used as a supplement.

I bought it for $24 Cdn. on Amazon in 2016. The fact that it's listed at $54 now is an absolute travesty.
 
imwhatim said:
I understand that any practice is good practice for gaining mathematical maturity, but I'll take that practice from elsewhere.
Then I would suggest doing so - much of any introductory book like this: https://www.math.unl.edu/~jlogan1/PDFfiles/New3rdEditionODE.pdf (legal copy) is about learning to manually solve differential equations that Mathematica can solve equally well. Do you consider that obsolete? If so, you might want to move on to more formal stuff in other fields and then maybe go through the excellent theoretical book by V I Arnold

If you want something you can chew on now, you could look at nonlinear dynamics by strogatz or this course: https://www.complexityexplorer.org/...athematical-and-computational-approaches-2024
 
You have enough time to study if you work.

I typically tell students only work the hours needed to survive and nothing more.
 
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
17K
Back
Top