Boson coherence at high temperatures?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BkBkBk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boson Coherence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of bosons and fermions at varying temperatures, specifically questioning whether high temperatures could cause gluons or photons to behave like fermions, losing their ability to occupy the same energy level. The conversation touches on concepts related to Bose-Einstein condensates, quark-gluon plasma, and the implications of extreme conditions in astrophysical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that at low temperatures, bosons can occupy the same energy level due to the Pauli exclusion principle not applying, leading to coherence.
  • Others suggest that at high temperatures, gluons or photons might interact in such a way that they behave like fermions, potentially leading to boundaries and loss of coherence.
  • A participant mentions the concept of quark-gluon plasma as a counterpoint to the original question, indicating that it represents a state where quarks and gluons are not confined.
  • There is a discussion about the conditions under which fermions can form Bose-Einstein condensates through pairing, such as Cooper pairs, and the implications for degenerate matter in astrophysical objects like white dwarfs and neutron stars.
  • One participant questions the meaning of "photons at high temperature," clarifying that temperature refers to the kinetic energy of particles and cannot be applied directly to photons themselves.
  • Another participant clarifies that they were referring to photons within a substance at high temperatures, such as those present before recombination in the early universe.
  • There is a mention of the TOV and Chandrasekhar limits in relation to overcoming the Pauli exclusion principle and the formation of black holes as a result of extreme pressure and temperature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of particles at high temperatures, with some supporting the idea of gluons or photons behaving like fermions, while others challenge this notion. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexities involved in discussing high-energy states and the limitations of current understanding regarding the transition points between different states of matter, particularly in extreme astrophysical environments.

BkBkBk
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I was just reading up on Bose-einstein condensates and was wondering about something,hopefully you could point me in the right direction.

so when you get atoms down to a low enough temperature the pauli exlusion principle gives out and they can sit ontop of each other like bosons,and they occupy the same energy level and become coherent(possibly not the right word to use here?),well what i was wondering was,at high enough temperatures could the reverse happen to say,gluons or photons,could you get the temperature high enough that they start to interact with themselves and start acting like fermions,with boundries? and loose their ability to sit ontop of eachtother?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BkBkBk said:
I was just reading up on Bose-einstein condensates and was wondering about something,hopefully you could point me in the right direction.

so when you get atoms down to a low enough temperature the pauli exlusion principle gives out and they can sit ontop of each other like bosons,and they occupy the same energy level and become coherent(possibly not the right word to use here?),well what i was wondering was,at high enough temperatures could the reverse happen to say,gluons or photons,could you get the temperature high enough that they start to interact with themselves and start acting like fermions,with boundries? and loose their ability to sit ontop of eachtother?

I think you have a few misconceptions here, but if I am correct in your question than the Quark-Gluon Plasma would be the opposite you're thinking of. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark–gluon_plasma

Some additions to clear those misconceptions.

Here, let me see if this helps you: B-E condensates are of BOSONS, which do not obey the Pauli Exclusion Principle, and the condensates made from fermions are:

wikipedia said:
Related experiments in cooling fermions rather than bosons to extremely low temperatures have created degenerate gases, where the atoms do not congregate in a single state due to the Pauli exclusion principle. To exhibit Bose–Einstein condensation, the fermions must "pair up" to form compound particles (e.g. molecules or Cooper pairs) that are bosons. The first molecular Bose–Einstein condensates were created in November 2003 by the groups of Rudolf Grimm at the University of Innsbruck, Deborah S. Jin at the University of Colorado at Boulder and Wolfgang Ketterle at MIT. Jin quickly went on to create the first fermionic condensate composed of Cooper pairs.[14]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose_einstein_condensate

You can get degenerate matter to some as-yet undetermined point, maybe quarks or more... definitely degenerate electrons (White Dwarf) and degenerate neutron matter (Neutron Stars). When you overcome all of that, you have a black-hole, not a B-E Condensate.
 
Last edited:
Perfect response thank you!

nismaratwork said:
You can get degenerate matter to some as-yet undetermined point, maybe quarks or more... definitely degenerate electrons (White Dwarf) and degenerate neutron matter (Neutron Stars). When you overcome all of that, you have a black-hole, not a B-E Condensate.

so if I've understood you properly,the point at which the pressure/temperature gets high enough to overcome the pauli exlusion principle would be equivilent to overcoming the TOV/Chandrasekhar limit?and so even if there was a change of state in the matter,we couldn't measure it anyway because the result of getting to that point would be a black hole?
 
what do you exactly mean by "photons at high temperature."
temperature is the kinetic energy of the molecules... you can not go faster than light, thus, you can not increase the temperature of photons!hope that helped
 
oh,didnt notice i had written it so badly,i didnt mean the photons themselves,rather the photons contained within a substance at high temperatures,nismaratwork was quite right in desciphering what i meant (a good example would be the trapped photons before recombination)
 
BkBkBk said:
Perfect response thank you!



so if I've understood you properly,the point at which the pressure/temperature gets high enough to overcome the pauli exlusion principle would be equivilent to overcoming the TOV/Chandrasekhar limit?and so even if there was a change of state in the matter,we couldn't measure it anyway because the result of getting to that point would be a black hole?

That's exactly it, at some point (neutrons or quarks or "x particle") GR says you get a singularity, and bam, you've gone past your limits. In nature, gravity does this, but it is as you imply, a function of mass in a small area, and that is high energy.

You were imprecise, but I understood, and I'm not even in the field. I think you did well, and remember this place is all about education anyway.

Ferovertish: Did you read the bit about QGP? I think that makes your point moot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K