Boson statistics and the uncertainty principle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between boson statistics and the uncertainty principle, particularly in the context of creating particles from a vacuum state and the implications for momentum determination when adding additional bosons to a system.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where creating a particle from a vacuum state leads to equal probabilities for all momentum states, consistent with the uncertainty principle.
  • The same participant argues that adding a 100th boson with a specific momentum k results in a significant likelihood of that boson also having momentum k, raising a question about a potential violation of the uncertainty principle.
  • Another participant clarifies notation used in the discussion.
  • A different participant emphasizes the necessity of considering the indistinguishability of particles and the overall state of the system, suggesting that if the added particle is localized better than the existing state, the bosonic enhancement factor may not be as expected.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of boson statistics for the uncertainty principle, with some questioning whether the creation of additional bosons violates the principle, while others argue that the indistinguishability of particles must be taken into account, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of creating particles from a vacuum state and the statistical behavior of bosons, but the assumptions regarding particle indistinguishability and the effects on momentum distribution are not fully resolved.

neerajareen
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
This question is regarding the boson statistics and it’s relation to the uncertainty principle. Consider we have a vacuum state and we apply a field operator on it to create a particle at position x, we end up with state like

\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{e^{ - ipx}}} \left| p \right\rangle
\end{array}

So there is an equal probability for all momentum. And the result is completely consistent with the uncertainty principle.
Now consider a situation where we have created 99 bosons with momentum k. Using the statistics of creation of creation operators, when we now add an additional particle, we have


\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {e^{ - i{p_1}x}}\left| {1,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_2}x}}\left| {0,1,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_k}x}}\sqrt {100} \left| {0,0,100,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_{k + 1}}x}}\left| {0,0,99,1,...} \right\rangle
\end{array}/

We see that that when we create the now particle, it is more likely to have momentum k than any other momentum by a factor of 100. In the limit that we have a thousand billion particles in a certain momentum and then create a particle at a certain position, with almost 100% we can determine the momentum that it will have. Does this not violate the uncertainty principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
just to clarify

/dag is the dagger symbol (hermitian conjugate).
 
neerajareen said:
This question is regarding the boson statistics and it’s relation to the uncertainty principle. Consider we have a vacuum state and we apply a field operator on it to create a particle at position x, we end up with state like

\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| 0 \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{e^{ - ipx}}} \left| p \right\rangle
\end{array}

So there is an equal probability for all momentum. And the result is completely consistent with the uncertainty principle.
Now consider a situation where we have created 99 bosons with momentum k. Using the statistics of creation of creation operators, when we now add an additional particle, we have


\begin{array}{l}
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {\psi ^\dag }(x)\left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum\limits_p^{} {{a^\dag }(p){e^{ - ipx}}} \left| {0,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle \\
\left| \psi \right\rangle = {e^{ - i{p_1}x}}\left| {1,0,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_2}x}}\left| {0,1,99,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_k}x}}\sqrt {100} \left| {0,0,100,0,...} \right\rangle + {e^{ - i{p_{k + 1}}x}}\left| {0,0,99,1,...} \right\rangle
\end{array}/

We see that that when we create the now particle, it is more likely to have momentum k than any other momentum by a factor of 100. In the limit that we have a thousand billion particles in a certain momentum and then create a particle at a certain position, with almost 100% we can determine the momentum that it will have. Does this not violate the uncertainty principle?


What does your notation \left| {0,0,99,1,...} \right\rangle mean?
 
In order to have an effect of boson statistics, you need indistinguishable particles. So you do not get n individual particles, but one n-particle state. So in adding a particle, you go from the n-1 to the n-particle state. It is the position and momentum of the whole state of indistinguishable particles you need to consider. If this whole state has a pretty sharp momentum, it will be rather delocalized. If you (let us just assume that is possible somehow) create a particle that is localized better than the n-1 particle state, the added particle and the other particles cannot be completely indistinguishable, so the bosonic enhancement factor will not be n, but smaller.
 
Thank you Cthuga. That makes sense
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
953
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K