Bosonic Field operator in this exponential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the bosonic field operator defined as $$W=e^{\imath f \phi(x)}$$, where ##f## is a parameter. When this operator acts on the vacuum state ##|0\rangle##, it generates a "coherent" state characterized by an uncertain number of particles, diverging from the original Fock basis. The Taylor series expansion of the exponential does not converge, necessitating a regularization approach, such as introducing a physical cutoff, as referenced in Itzykson and Zuber's work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bosonic fields and operators
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory concepts
  • Knowledge of Fock space and coherent states
  • Basic principles of regularization in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of coherent states in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of regularization in quantum field theory
  • Read Itzykson and Zuber's "Quantum Field Theory", specifically Section 4-1-2
  • Investigate the implications of the Taylor series in quantum operators
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum field theorists, and students interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics, particularly those exploring bosonic fields and coherent states.

QFT1995
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
If i had a bosonic field ##\phi(x)## and I took the exponential in the following way to get the operator $$W=e^{\imath f \phi(x)}$$ where ##f## is a parameter what effect would this have when acting on the vacuum ##|0\rangle##? Is it analogous to the space translation operator? Will it transform the vacuum into some state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking the exponential of a distribution is ill-defined and needs a regularization to give it a meaning. The result is a state not described by the original Fock basis.
 
QFT1995 said:
If i had a bosonic field ##\phi(x)## and I took the exponential in the following way to get the operator $$W=e^{\imath f \phi(x)}$$ where ##f## is a parameter what effect would this have when acting on the vacuum ##|0\rangle##? Is it analogous to the space translation operator? Will it transform the vacuum into some state?
You get a "coherent" state in which the number of particles is uncertain. To see that, expand the exponential in the Taylor series and split the field into creation and destruction operators.

As @A. Neumaier alluded, the Taylor series does not really converge, but this mathematical nuisance can be fixed by introducing a physical cutoff. See e.g. the book by Itzykson and Zuber, Sec. 4-1-2.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 167 ·
6
Replies
167
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K