Bound volume and surface charges in dielectric

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 5K views
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



2lih0g4.png


Find surface and volume charge densities. Deduce electric field.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Volume charge density:
[tex]\epsilon_0 \epsilon_r \nabla . \vec E = \rho_f[/tex]

Using ##\vec P = \chi \epsilon_0 \vec E = (\epsilon_r -1)\epsilon_0 \vec E##:
[tex]\left(\frac{\epsilon_r}{\epsilon_r -1}\right) \nabla . \vec P = \rho_f[/tex]

Thus volume charge density:
[tex]\rho_f = \left(\frac{\epsilon_r}{\epsilon_r -1}\right) \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r} \left[ P_0 r^3(a-r)\right][/tex]
[tex]\rho_f = \left(\frac{\epsilon_r}{\epsilon_r -1}\right) P_0 (3a-4r)[/tex]

Surface charge density is less tedious:
[tex]\sigma_b = \vec P . \hat n = P_0 r(a-r)[/tex]

Isn't the electric field within the sphere simply ##\vec E = \frac{1}{\epsilon_0 (\epsilon_r -1)} \vec P = \frac{P_0}{\epsilon_0 (\epsilon_r -1)} r(a-r) \hat r##?

For electric field outside sphere:
[tex]\epsilon_0 E (4\pi r^2) = \int_0^a \rho_f dr[/tex]
[tex]E = \frac{\epsilon_r P_0}{4\pi \epsilon_0 (\epsilon_r -1)} \left(\frac{a}{r}\right)^2[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Isn't volume charge density simply [itex]-\nabla .\vec{P}[/itex]? And since they have not mentioned [itex]\epsilon_r[/itex], you cannot use it in your solution. Moreover, they have not said that the material in linear, isotropic and homogeneous... so [itex]\vec{P}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{E}[/itex] may not be related as such.
 
Sunil Simha said:
Hi,

Isn't volume charge density simply [itex]-\nabla .\vec{P}[/itex]? And since they have not mentioned [itex]\epsilon_r[/itex], you cannot use it in your solution. Moreover, they have not said that the material in linear, isotropic and homogeneous... so [itex]\vec{P}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{E}[/itex] may not be related as such.

Ok, so the bound volume chage density is [itex]-\nabla .\vec{P}[/itex].

The surface charge density is ##\vec P \cdot \hat n##.

Gauss's law reads:

[tex]\epsilon_0 \nabla \cdot \vec E = \rho_b + \rho_f[/tex]

In this case there are no free charges, so:

[tex]\epsilon_0 \nabla \cdot \vec E = \rho_b = -\nabla \cdot \vec P[/tex]

Thus, ##E = \frac{1}{\epsilon_0} \vec P## ?