Boundary Conditions and Hilbert Space

In summary, the conversation discusses issues related to the extension of finite-dimensional vector spaces to infinite-dimensional spaces in quantum mechanics. The concept of hermiticity is not enough for operators in infinite-dimensional spaces, and boundary conditions play a crucial role in determining the self-adjoint extensions of these operators. The collapse of the wavefunction during measurements also raises questions about the idealization of measurements and the uncertainty principle. It is suggested to read von Neumann's "mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics" for a deeper understanding of these concepts.
  • #1
Manchot
473
4
Hey all,

Last year, I took my university's undergraduate QM sequence. We mainly used Griffiths' book, but we also used a little of Shankar's. Anyway, I decided to go through Shankar's book this year, in a more formal treatment of QM. After the first chapter, I already have some questions that I hope can be answered:

1. When extending the results from finite-dimensional vector spaces to the infinite-dimensional spaces, it was assumed that most of the same results would hold. I really don't have a big conceptual problem with this, except in the case of matrix elements. Shankar shows that Hermiticity of the matrix elements of an operator in an infinite-dimensional space is not a sufficient condition for that operator to be Hermitian; namely, the surface term must also vanish for all vectors in the space. I can see the mathematical reason for this, but conceptually, what is the reason? My guess is that because the basis vectors are not well-defined at the endpoints, the matrix elements are not well-defined there as well (e.g., in position space, the basis vector at the endpoint is only "half" a delta function). Is this line of reasoning correct?

2. All throughout QM last year, I was deeply troubled by the fact that the boundary conditions were applied during the calculation of eigenvectors rather than after. For example, in the calculation of the states of the infinite square well, I didn't like that the endpoint-vanishing conditions were applied when calculating the eigenvectors (and quantizing them) as opposed to summing over all the continuous range of eigenvectors and then applying the same results (getting delta functions at the quantized values). I never really understood where this comes from, so I'd like to now venture a guess. Does this just arise from the definition of physical Hilbert space? As the surface term must vanish for the Hamiltonian to be Hermitian, one might conclude that to get a physical system, one must force the surface terms to be zero for all vectors in the space (including the eigenvectors, of course). That would explain a lot to me, but not quite everything. For example, what about the continuity of the wavefunction? Again, that could be explained away by incorporating continuity into the definition of physical Hilbert space. However, I wouldn't see the motivation behind doing this. Finally, what about the near-continuity of the derivative of the wavefunction? Since it depends on the value of the Hamiltonian at certain points, I wouldn't think that this could be logically incorporated into the definition of Hilbert space very easily.

Can anyone resolve these issues for me? If so, I would greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ok, I've done some thinking on the matter, and I've decided that a near-adequate definition of Hilbert space is the space of square-integrable continuous functions. This forces the eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian to be continuous, and therefore satisfy the continuity boundary conditions. Nevertheless, it excludes the possibility of plane wave solutions, as well as the position and momentum basis vectors. Can anyone provide a better, more adequate definition for me?
 
  • #3
The matter you're addressing is rather subtle. First of all, the idea of infinite dimensional topological vector spaces automatically brings in issues of convergence and continuity. The concept of "hermiticity" for matrix elements is still the same (the matrix should be equal to the complex conjugate of its transpose), however operator issues are not that easy to generalize from finite to infinite dimensional spaces. Hermiticity (or symmetry) is not enough and we'll need at least essential self-adjointness for an accurate description of observables into Hilbert space context.

There's something more. Boundary conditions are crucial in this discussion, because our Hamiltonians, when quantized using various prescriptions, are only symmetric and, in principle, have several self-adjoint extensions (measure of which are its deficiency indices) and different boundary conditions imply different self-adjoint extensions and basically different physics.

The cases when Hamiltonians of quantum systems have eigenvectors in the Hilbert space one initially chose for a mathematical description of the problem are very fortunate, since that means that the operators have a pure point spectrum. In most cases, the Hamiltonians also have a continuous spectrum (or only continuous spectrum) and the rather difficult and vast mathematics of Hilbert spaces is not enough to a get that mathematical description of reality that every theory of physics provides.

Daniel.
 
  • #4
Ok, here's a dumb question. When you do a measurement of a Hermitian operator, we say that the wavefunction collapses to one of that operator's eigenvectors. Obviously, if you do a position or momentum measurement, the resulting wavefunction cannot be in Hilbert space, since the eigenvectors are non-normalizable. Physically, then, what happens? Say you did a position measurement. In position space, does the wavefunction really collapse to a delta function, or does it just collapse to something close to one (e.g., a really tall Gaussian)?
 
  • #5
Physically, there is no such thing as a perfect/ideal measurement that would give you the position of some object; usually we get a distribution of positions.
 
  • #6
There's the Heisenberg UP that prevents us from getting exact measurements for the position of a particle at quantum level.

Daniel.
 
  • #7
Yeah, but I thought that the UP didn't really matter for that, since a collapsed delta function would have a position uncertainty of zero and a momentum uncertainty of infinity, which could mathematically still cancel out to be higher than hbar/2.
 
  • #8
If you want to know about all that, I guess it is a good idea to pick up von Neumann's "mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics"...

Warning: the typesetting of that old book is horrible.
 
  • #9
Manchot said:
Yeah, but I thought that the UP didn't really matter for that, since a collapsed delta function would have a position uncertainty of zero and a momentum uncertainty of infinity, which could mathematically still cancel out to be higher than hbar/2.

Well, the problem is that [tex] \infty \cdot 0 [/tex] is not really defined for a physicist and so it makes no sense to compare it with a real number.

Daniel.
 
  • #10
Manchot said:
Yeah, but I thought that the UP didn't really matter for that, since a collapsed delta function would have a position uncertainty of zero and a momentum uncertainty of infinity, which could mathematically still cancel out to be higher than hbar/2.


The issue here is the fact that once you perform a "perfect" position measurement, the wavefunction is now in an eigenstate of the position operator, so speaking about the measurement of the momentum from that point on makes little sense, since (obviously) position and momentum don't commute
([x,p] =i*hbar)
 

Related to Boundary Conditions and Hilbert Space

1. What are boundary conditions in physics?

Boundary conditions in physics refer to the conditions that must be satisfied at the boundaries of a physical system in order to accurately describe its behavior. These conditions can include the values of physical quantities, such as temperature or pressure, or constraints on the behavior of the system, such as fixed walls or reflective boundaries.

2. What is a Hilbert space?

A Hilbert space is a mathematical concept that represents an infinite-dimensional vector space. It is used in quantum mechanics to describe the state of a physical system, where each state is represented by a vector in the Hilbert space. The inner product of two vectors in a Hilbert space gives the probability amplitude for a transition between those states.

3. How are boundary conditions related to Hilbert space?

In quantum mechanics, the boundary conditions of a physical system are used to define the Hilbert space in which the system exists. The boundary conditions determine the allowable states of the system, and thus the vectors that make up the Hilbert space. The behavior of the system can then be described by operators acting on these vectors.

4. Why are Hilbert spaces important in quantum mechanics?

Hilbert spaces are essential in quantum mechanics because they provide a mathematical framework for describing the behavior of physical systems at the quantum level. The concept of a Hilbert space allows for the representation of states, operators, and measurements in a consistent and mathematically rigorous manner, making it a crucial tool for understanding the behavior of particles and systems on a microscopic scale.

5. How do boundary conditions affect the solutions of quantum systems?

Boundary conditions can significantly influence the solutions of quantum systems by limiting the possible states and behaviors of the system. For example, certain boundary conditions may result in discrete energy levels for a particle in a potential well, while others may result in a continuous spectrum of energy levels. The choice of boundary conditions can also affect the symmetry properties of the solutions and the overall behavior of the system.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
61
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
555
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
17
Views
954
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
67
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
850
Replies
11
Views
701
Replies
22
Views
941
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top