Boundary Conditions and Solutions to Differential Equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the function f(x) = A exp(σx) + B exp(-σx) is a solution to the differential equation f''(x) = (σ^2)f(x) under the boundary condition f(-∞) = 0. Participants conclude that for the boundary condition to hold, the constant B must equal zero, as B exp(-σx) approaches infinity as x approaches negative infinity if σ > 0. Thus, the only valid solution satisfying the boundary condition is f(x) = A exp(σx).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically second-order linear equations.
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in mathematical analysis.
  • Basic skills in mathematical proof techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of boundary conditions in differential equations.
  • Learn about the method of undetermined coefficients for solving differential equations.
  • Explore the concept of stability in solutions to differential equations.
  • Investigate the role of initial conditions versus boundary conditions in mathematical modeling.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with differential equations and boundary value problems.

cytochrome
Messages
163
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Show that f(x) = A exp(σx) + B exp(-σx) is a solution to the
following differential equation:

f''(x) = (σ^2)f(x)

where A, B, and σ are constants. What if a boundary condition is
included that f(-∞) = 0?


Homework Equations


differential equation: f''(x) = (σ^2)f(x)
solution: f(x) = A exp(σx) + B exp(-σx)

The Attempt at a Solution


Proof -
Plugging exp(σx) and exp(-σx) into the equation f''(x) = (σ^2)f(x) gives an equality, therefore any linear combination of exp(σx) and exp(-σx) is a solution.


If the boundary condition f(-∞) = 0 is introduced, would only exp(σx) be a solution since exp(-∞)=0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cytochrome said:
If the boundary condition f(-∞) = 0 is introduced, would only exp(σx) be a solution since exp(-∞)=0?

That certainly allows B=0 to be a solution, but show also that B must be zero.
(Of course, this is assuming sigma > 0.)
 
haruspex said:
That certainly allows B=0 to be a solution, but show also that B must be zero.
(Of course, this is assuming sigma > 0.)

I'm confused about how to do this?

B must be zero because Bexp^(-∞) = 0... is that sufficient?
 
cytochrome said:
I'm confused about how to do this?

B must be zero because Bexp^(-∞) = 0... is that sufficient?

No. e-σx → +∞ as x → -∞ , if σ > 0 .
 
So if the boundary condition f(-inf) is involved, then is the answer Aexp()?

Can someone please explain boundary conditions?
 
hi cytochrome! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
cytochrome said:
So if the boundary condition f(-inf) is involved, then is the answer Aexp()?

yes, the general solution is y = Aeσx
Can someone please explain boundary conditions?

to completely solve a differential equation, you need as many boundary conditions as there are constants

here, there were two constants but only one boundary condition, so your solution still has one unknown constant
 
tiny-tim said:
hi cytochrome! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)


yes, the general solution is y = Aeσx


to completely solve a differential equation, you need as many boundary conditions as there are constants

here, there were two constants but only one boundary condition, so your solution still has one unknown constant

Thanks!

So the question is for the boundary condition f(-∞), therefore the answer would just be the general solution?
 
Your very first solution was correct, it's just that the reasoning you offered was insufficient. A exp(σx) is the solution that satisfies the boundary condition. You just have to prove that B=0. What would happen to f(x) at -∞ if B were nonzero?
 
haruspex said:
Your very first solution was correct, it's just that the reasoning you offered was insufficient. A exp(σx) is the solution that satisfies the boundary condition. You just have to prove that B=0. What would happen to f(x) at -∞ if B were nonzero?

If B ≠ 0 then f(-∞) = 0 doesn't make sense since this only works if f(x) = Aexp(σx).

Is my reasoning correct?
 
  • #10
cytochrome said:
If B ≠ 0 then f(-∞) = 0 doesn't make sense since this only works if f(x) = Aexp(σx).

Is my reasoning correct?
I don't see any "reasoning" here, simply the assertion that "if B ≠ 0 then f(-∞) = 0 doesn't make sense". WHY does it not make any sense?
 
  • #11
HallsofIvy said:
I don't see any "reasoning" here, simply the assertion that "if B ≠ 0 then f(-∞) = 0 doesn't make sense". WHY does it not make any sense?

Well f(-∞) = 0 implies that Aexp(x) is the only possible answer. Bexp(-x) doesn't work because as x → -∞ then Bexp(-x) → 0

Is that a good way to show it?
 
  • #12
cytochrome said:
as x → -∞ then Bexp(-x) → 0
No it doesn't! Get that right and you're home.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K