Why Do We Keep the 2x(hat) for E3?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the electric fields E1, E3, and ps2, with a focus on the reasoning for maintaining the 2x(hat) component for E3. It highlights confusion regarding the behavior of electric field components across charge densities, particularly the normal and tangential components. The original poster initially struggled with the boundary conditions and the role of the 2x(hat) component but later clarified their understanding of the problem. The need for clearer explanations in unconventional problem statements is also emphasized. Ultimately, the poster resolved their confusion regarding the electric field components.
Marcin H
Messages
306
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Screen Shot 2017-09-23 at 7.25.46 PM.png


Screen Shot 2017-09-25 at 3.45.49 PM.png


Find E1, E3, and ps2

Homework Equations


boundary conditions

The Attempt at a Solution



(these are class notes)[/B]
I understand how to find E1, but I am a bit confused about the reasoning behind finding E3... Why do we leave the 2x(hat) for E3...? I though that only tangential components of E don't change across a charge density, but the normal does change which is why we have to use boundary conditions and n (dot) (D1-D2)... But we don't have ps here so we can't use that. Why do we keep the 2x(hat)? I get the y(hat) and z(hat) part because they are tangential, but not the x(hat).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement that you posted is somewhat unconventional. Can you clarify it using a few more English words?
 
kuruman said:
The problem statement that you posted is somewhat unconventional. Can you clarify it using a few more English words?
I figured it out. I was in a hurry and forgot to explain the problem at the top. Sorry bout that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K