Bounding Surface of Volume Integral: Sphere at Origin

  • Thread starter Thread starter rafaelpol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of bounding surfaces in volume integrals, specifically regarding a sphere at the origin with radius "a". The participant questions how the bounding surface can be the spherical surface when integrating over a region where r is greater than "a". The reference to Greiner's "Classical Electrodynamics" indicates that while the volume integral is defined for r > a, the spherical surface at radius "a" is still considered part of the bounding surface. The confusion arises from the definition of a bounding surface, which is clarified to include the spherical surface as a critical component of the volume being integrated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of volume integrals in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and their applications
  • Knowledge of the concept of bounding surfaces in mathematical analysis
  • Basic principles of classical electrodynamics as referenced in Greiner's text
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of bounding surfaces in mathematical analysis
  • Explore spherical coordinates and their role in volume integrals
  • Review Greiner's "Classical Electrodynamics" for context on volume integrals
  • Practice problems involving volume integrals over spherical regions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and mathematics, particularly those studying multivariable calculus and classical electrodynamics, will benefit from this discussion.

rafaelpol
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Say I have a sphere at the origin with radius "a". If I am integrating over a region in which r is greater than "a", how can the bounding surface of this volume be the spherical surface? This comes from an explanation in Greiner Classical Electrodynamics, in which he says the volume integral was done in a region such that r is greater than "a", but at the same time he says the bounding surface of this volume is the sphere...


The Attempt at a Solution



I feel like I am missing something on the definition of a bounding surface, but the only definition I can find is the one that says that it is the surface that "binds" the whole volume. Hence, the spherical surface at "a" might be a part of the surface that is part of the volume "v", but there should be more, since the integration wasn't done over the sphere.

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe you integrate from a<R<r , But I am not sure
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K