Bowling Question - Rotational Motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction (μk) for a bowling ball transitioning from slipping to rolling without slipping. The ball, with an initial velocity of 6.00 m/s, slips for half the length of a 19.0 m bowling alley, leading to a calculated μk of approximately 0.0995. The user successfully combined kinematic equations to derive this value, confirming the physical correctness of their approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational motion and angular velocity
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations for linear and angular motion
  • Basic principles of friction and its coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between linear and angular acceleration in rolling motion
  • Explore the derivation of the coefficient of kinetic friction in various materials
  • Learn about the conservation of energy in rotational dynamics
  • Investigate the effects of different surface materials on friction coefficients
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotational motion and friction in sports equipment.

gingerelle
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A uniform, spherical bowling ball of mass m and radius R is projected horizontally along the
floor at an initial velocity v0 = 6.00 m/s. The ball is not rotating initially, so w0 = 0. It
picks up rotation due to (kinetic) friction as it initially slips along the floor. The coefficient of
kinetic friction between the ball and the floor is μk. After a time ts, the ball stops slipping and makes a transition to rolling without slipping at angular speed w(s) and translational velocity v(s).
Thereafter, it rolls without slipping at constant velocity.

If a standard bowling alley is 19.0 m long and the ball slips for half its length, what is the
value of μk?

Homework Equations



1]]] L = Iw
2]]] F = ma
3]]] Torque = r cross F
4]]] x(f) = x(initial) + v0t + 1/2at^2
5]]] theta(f) = theta (i) + w(0)t + 1/2angularacceleration(t^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



So, basically, I found the linear acceleration equation and the angular acceleration of the ball, as well as Ts (and I know these answers are correct). But I just wanted to check if I'm allowed to do the following:

I added equation 4 and equation 5 together, and made it equal to 9.5 metres. But before that, I converted equation 5 into metres by multiplying both sides by (pi X R)/180 degrees ...since 360 degrees turn = 1 circumference travelled.

after I did that, I just subbed time (Ts) equation in (from what I calculated before) and when I isolated uk, I got around 0.0995 (coefficient of friction). But basically, I was just wondering if that's...physically correct..adding the two equations and making it equal 9.5m (half of 19.0 metres, which is the distance that the ball skidded for). thanks and please reply.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gingerelle said:

Homework Statement



A uniform, spherical bowling ball of mass m and radius R is projected horizontally along the
floor at an initial velocity v0 = 6.00 m/s. The ball is not rotating initially, so w0 = 0. It
picks up rotation due to (kinetic) friction as it initially slips along the floor. The coefficient of
kinetic friction between the ball and the floor is μk. After a time ts, the ball stops slipping and makes a transition to rolling without slipping at angular speed w(s) and translational velocity v(s).
Thereafter, it rolls without slipping at constant velocity.

If a standard bowling alley is 19.0 m long and the ball slips for half its length, what is the
value of μk?

Homework Equations



1]]] L = Iw
2]]] F = ma
3]]] Torque = r cross F
4]]] x(f) = x(initial) + v0t + 1/2at^2
5]]] theta(f) = theta (i) + w(0)t + 1/2angularacceleration(t^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



So, basically, I found the linear acceleration equation and the angular acceleration of the ball, as well as Ts (and I know these answers are correct). But I just wanted to check if I'm allowed to do the following:

I added equation 4 and equation 5 together, and made it equal to 9.5 metres. But before that, I converted equation 5 into metres by multiplying both sides by (pi X R)/180 degrees ...since 360 degrees turn = 1 circumference travelled.

after I did that, I just subbed time (Ts) equation in (from what I calculated before) and when I isolated uk, I got around 0.0995 (coefficient of friction). But basically, I was just wondering if that's...physically correct..adding the two equations and making it equal 9.5m (half of 19.0 metres, which is the distance that the ball skidded for). thanks and please reply.

[tex]\vec{v}_f^2=36m/s-19m\cdot\vec{a}[/tex]. This final velocity is when it starts picking up angular velocity (id est, [tex]\vec{v}=\vec{r\omega}[/tex]).
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K