Branch Cuts for Complex Powers: How Should We Choose the Branch?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Branch Complex
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the selection of branch cuts for complex powers, specifically in the context of integrating a function involving \( z^{-s} \) and the logarithm of an analytic function \( \mathcal{F(z)} \). Participants explore the implications of different choices of branch cuts on the integration process, considering the multivalued nature of the functions involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the choice of a branch cut on the negative real axis for \( z^{-s} \), suggesting that a branch corresponding to an angle of \( \frac{2\pi}{s} \) might be more appropriate given the multivalued nature of the function.
  • Another participant asks clarifying questions regarding the nature of the problem, including whether it is a homework problem and the specifics of the contour \( \gamma \) and the variable \( s \).
  • A participant notes that the branch cut should ideally pass through all branch points to ensure the region is simply connected, preventing any arcs from winding around missing branch points.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of \( s \) being a negative integer and the complexities that arise when \( s \) is not an integer, with a participant mentioning that \( z^{-s} \) does not necessarily have branch points for certain rational values of \( s \).
  • Another participant clarifies that while the logarithm of a function is multivalued near its zeros, the derivative of the logarithm remains well-defined and single-valued except at the zeros themselves, which are problematic for the logarithm.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of working within a branch of the logarithm to make sense of the integration question posed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate choice of branch cuts and the implications of the variable \( s \). There is no consensus on the best approach, and multiple competing perspectives remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the specific definitions of branch cuts and the nature of the function \( \mathcal{F(z)} \). The discussion also highlights unresolved mathematical steps regarding the integration process and the behavior of \( z^{-s} \) under different conditions.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I need to perform the following integration:

##I(s) = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{\gamma}\text{d}z\ z^{-s} \frac{\text{d}\ln\mathcal{F(z)}}{\text{d}z}##,

where ##\mathcal{F(z)}## is analytic everywhere on the complex plane except at the zeroes of the function.

For the purpose of integration, the branch cut which is implied by ##z^{-s}## is chosen to be on the negative real ##z-##axis, as follows.

The following link shows the branch cut: http://s24.postimg.org/eoxg0dbo5/Stack_Exchange_Question.jpg

I understand that the function $z^{-s}$ is multivalued, but that function has $s$ complex roots over the complex plane, so should we not choose a branch that corresponds to an angle of $\frac{2\pi}{s}$ of the complex plane?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one has answered for a few days so I will take a stab.
First I have a few questions: 1) is this a homework problem? 2) what is the contour ##\gamma##? 2) are there any restrictions on ##s##?
failexam said:
I need to perform the following integration:

##I(s) = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{\gamma}\text{d}z\ z^{-s} \frac{\text{d}\ln\mathcal{F(z)}}{\text{d}z}##,

where ##\mathcal{F(z)}## is analytic everywhere on the complex plane except at the zeroes of the function.
I'm not sure what you mean by this statement about ##\mathcal{F(z)}##.

failexam said:
I understand that the function $z^{-s}$ is multivalued, but that function has $s$ complex roots over the complex plane, so should we not choose a branch that corresponds to an angle of $\frac{2\pi}{s}$ of the complex plane?
Almost. ##z^{-s}## is indeed a multivalued function as long as ##s## is not an integer. When ##s## is irrational it has an infinite number of values. If it is rational the denominator tells you how many values. When you dealt with more specific functions like ##\sqrt{z}##, did the power on ##z## determine the direction of the branch cut?

jason
 
a basic principle is that the branch cut be chosen to pass through all branch points and render the region simply connected. I.e. as long as the cut makes it impossible for any arc to wind around a missing branch point, it is sufficient.
 
failexam said:
< snip>

I understand that the function $z^{-s}$ is multivalued, but that function has $s$ complex roots over the complex plane, so should we not choose a branch that corresponds to an angle of $\frac{2\pi}{s}$ of the complex plane?

Assuming ##s ## is a negative integer. Otherwise it gets much hairier. And maybe I am missing something (sorry I snipped the first part, I don't know how to paste it back in ) but if by ##ln## you mean the complex log, then ##ln f(z) ## cannot be defined at the zeros of ##f(z) ##.
 
It is true the log of a function is multiple valued in a disc containing a zero, except at the center where it is not defined. However any two of its many different choices of values, at points near the zero, differ by a constant, so the derivative of the log is well defined and single valued, except again at the zero itself. Now apparently he wants to compute an integral along a path that does not pass through a zero of f, so the integral makes sense as long as he chooses a region in which f has a holomorphic "branch", i.e. off the branch cut shown.

Apparently he also means f is analytic everywhere, since the zeroes of f are not a problem for f, they are a problem for dLn(f).

Now actually, unless s is a non integer, like 1/2, there are not necessarily branch points for z^(-s) either. I.e. z^(-3) for instance poses no problem since it is well defined near zero and even has residue zero there, so would contribute zero to the integral as long as the path avoids z=0.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Wonk, I realized it just recently, that the question makes sense only when we are working within a branch of the log. We do need the wonk, give us the wonk... :).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K