Brave Guy Leaps Off Cliff For Girl Making Some People Laugh N Cry.

  • Thread starter Thread starter FinlandGirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Girl
Click For Summary
A video titled "Brave Guy Leaps Off Cliff For Girl" has sparked a mix of emotional responses, with some viewers finding it impressive while others deem it pointless and boring. The video's narrative, which includes a man performing various physical feats, is criticized for lacking clarity about his relationship with the girl, leading to speculation about her absence. Many participants express regret over the time spent watching, with some humorously suggesting they would prefer to have seen an actual cliff jump. The discussion also reveals suspicions that the video is part of a spam promotion campaign, with users sharing their experiences of encountering similar posts across multiple forums. Overall, the thread highlights the community's skepticism and amusement regarding the video's content and its promotion.
  • #31


Michael Xi said:
You're Bored, aren't you?
Would you like to give me a dissertation regarding from where the name SPAM came?
In my admitted lack of knowledge on the subject, for all that I know, it's an acronym, so I capitalized it accordingly.
Please pardon my ignorance getting in the way of the actual Obvious point.
:rolleyes::blushing:
I was just trying to give a Friendly "Heads Up" to a Community which I Respect.
:smile:

Chi Meson said:
I thought so!

Do I get a point? Can I add it to the trivia score? Integral is way ahead!

What do you mean, "I thought so!"? No one provided the dissertation, yet! How could you know if you were right or wrong!?

Anyway:
Wikipedia said:
Origin of the term "spam"
It is widely believed the term spam is derived from the 1970 SPAM sketch of the BBC television comedy series "Monty Python's Flying Circus".

The sketch is set in a cafe where nearly every item on the menu includes SPAM luncheon meat. As the waiter recites the SPAM-filled menu, a chorus of Viking patrons drowns out all conversations with a song repeating "SPAM, SPAM, SPAM, SPAM... lovely SPAM, wonderful SPAM", hence "SPAMming" the dialogue. The excessive amount of SPAM mentioned in the sketch is a reference to British rationing during World War II. SPAM was one of the few meat products that avoided rationing, and hence was widely available.

In the 1980s the term was adopted to describe certain abusive users who frequented BBSs and MUDs, who would repeat "SPAM" a huge number of times to scroll other users' text off the screen. In early Chat rooms services like PeopleLink and the early days of AOL, they actually flooded the screen with quotes from the Monty Python Spam sketch. With internet connections over phone lines, typically running at 1200 or even 300 BAUD, it could take an enormous amount of time for a spammy logo, drawn in ASCII art to scroll to completion on a viewer's terminal. Sending an irritating, large, meaningless block of text in this way was called spamming. This was used as a tactic by insiders of a group that wanted to drive newcomers out of the room so the usual conversation could continue. It was also used to prevent members of rival groups from chatting—for instance, Star Wars fans often invaded Star Trek chat rooms, filling the space with blocks of text until the Star Trek fans left. This act, previously called flooding or trashing, came to be known as spamming. The term was soon applied to a large amount of text broadcast by many users.

It later came to be used on Usenet to mean excessive multiple posting—the repeated posting of the same message. The unwanted message would appear in many if not all newsgroups, just as SPAM appeared in all the menu items in the Monty Python sketch. The first usage of this sense was by Joel Furr in the aftermath of the ARMM incident of March 31, 1993, in which a piece of experimental software released dozens of recursive messages onto the news.admin.policy newsgroup. This use had also become established—to spam Usenet was flooding newsgroups with junk messages. The word was also attributed to the flood of "Make Money Fast" messages that clogged many newsgroups during the 1990s.

In 1998, the New Oxford Dictionary of English, which had previously only defined "spam" in relation to the trademarked food product, added a second definition to its entry for "spam": "Irrelevant or inappropriate messages sent on the Internet to a large number of newsgroups or users."

There are three popular false etymologies of the word "spam". The first, promulgated by early spammers Canter & Siegel, is that "spamming" is what happens when one dumps a can of SPAM luncheon meat into a fan blade. The second is the backronym "**** posing as mail." The third is similar, using "stupid pointless annoying messages." Another false etymology is the Esperanto interpretation: The term spamo (with the o-ending designating nouns) makes sense as "senpete alsendita mesaĝo", which means "a message sent to someone without request".

So, no, you don't have to capitalize every letter of "spam". You fell for a false etymology.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


BobG said:
So, no, you don't have to capitalize every letter of "spam". You fell for a false etymology.

I thought so!

Another point!
 
  • #33


Michael Xi said:
You're Bored, aren't you?
It was more a reference to the sense of urgency and alarm in your post. It sounded like you were trying protect us from some sort of harm by saving us from watching the video. :rolleyes:

(Besides, it's not spam anyway. It's not being shoved at anyone. What it is, is viral marketing (the difference being that viewers particpate willingly, and the message is propogated by the viewers.)

Now, none of this is to say that I don't appreciate you letting me/us know that there's a nefarious purpose behind this erstwhile innocent video...
 
Last edited:
  • #34


BobG said:
Code:
In the 1980s the term was adopted to describe certain abusive users who frequented BBSs and MUDs, who would repeat "SPAM" a huge number of times to scroll other users' text off the screen.
Now this I did not know. That pushes the origin back another step to the earliest uses of the term.

Though I'm still curious as to who made the first connection. I doubt these mischievous bandwidth abusers were clever enough to ivent that connection themselves.
 
  • #35


DaveC426913 said:
Now, none of this is to say that I don't appreciate you letting me/us know that there's a nefarious purpose behind this erstwhile innocent
and crappy
video...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 206 ·
7
Replies
206
Views
19K