Break Speed of Light: What Happens Next?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the implications of exceeding the speed of light, particularly in the context of stellar explosions and black hole formation. Participants explore theoretical scenarios involving time travel and the nature of black holes, while addressing misconceptions about the speed of light and energy propagation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that breaking the speed of light could lead to time travel, questioning the nature of black holes as potential gateways to the past.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that energy from a star explosion could travel faster than light, asserting that such a claim is incorrect.
  • A different participant reiterates the notion that energy involved in stellar explosions does not exceed the speed of light and emphasizes that faster-than-light movement does not equate to time travel.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the theories surrounding black holes and their formation, suggesting a need for further understanding of relativity.
  • A later reply critiques the speculative nature of the initial claims, urging the original poster to verify foundational concepts before making further extrapolations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the possibility of energy traveling faster than light and the implications of such a scenario. There is no consensus on the validity of the initial claims about black holes and time travel.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding special relativity and general relativity before engaging in speculative discussions about astrophysical phenomena. The conversation highlights the reliance on potentially faulty assumptions in the original claims.

almi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, this is my first post here and I'm sorry if I say a dumb thing. Something is bothering me for a long time... I have read that if you break the speed of light you will go back in time. Ok... So what if when a star explodes, and creates a black hole, the energy released from the explosion travels faster than the speed of light? It creates a hole in the time fabric in which all the matter and light are sucked in... I could go on from this with lots of theories but I don't have enough space on the forum :))... Sorry for my english, I'm from Romania :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
almi said:
I have read that if you break the speed of light you will go back in time.
This isn't quite true. What will happen is just that different observers will disagree about whether the object that moved faster than light traveled from A to B, or from B to A.

almi said:
Ok... So what if when a star explodes, and creates a black hole, the energy released from the explosion travels faster than the speed of light?
It doesn't.
 
I understand what you are saying. But what I wanted to say is that if before a black hole is created the energy that is produced by the explosion of a star, if it travels faster than the speed of light, could trigger the forming of the black hole... So, what if the black hole isn't a dot where matter is compressed to the infinite? What if it is a gateway to the past?
 
Basically, all of your assumptions are wrong here. The energy involved in a star exploding does NOT move "faster than light" and, anyway, "moving faster than light" does NOT mean "moving back in time".
 


almi said:
I understand what you are saying. But what I wanted to say is that if before a black hole is created the energy that is produced by the explosion of a star, if it travels faster than the speed of light, could trigger the forming of the black hole... So, what if the black hole isn't a dot where matter is compressed to the infinite? What if it is a gateway to the past?

I don't know much about the theories behind black holes, but the theory of relativity, denies any possibility for anything (energy, waves, matter) to move faster than the speed of light.
And, there is not any satisfactory explanation of even what it means by going into the past, l
 
almi said:
Hello, this is my first post here and I'm sorry if I say a dumb thing. Something is bothering me for a long time... I have read that if you break the speed of light you will go back in time. Ok... So what if when a star explodes, and creates a black hole, the energy released from the explosion travels faster than the speed of light? It creates a hole in the time fabric in which all the matter and light are sucked in... I could go on from this with lots of theories but I don't have enough space on the forum :))... Sorry for my english, I'm from Romania :P

almi said:
I understand what you are saying. But what I wanted to say is that if before a black hole is created the energy that is produced by the explosion of a star, if it travels faster than the speed of light, could trigger the forming of the black hole... So, what if the black hole isn't a dot where matter is compressed to the infinite? What if it is a gateway to the past?

One of the things we try to do in this forum is for people to learn some basic concepts before they extrapolate that into something else. What you are doing here is https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=414380", i.e. making speculative post. It is considered speculative because you never bothered to first double-check if what you are using to base your post on is correct. In this case, you started with what you perceived to be a "fact" ("... explosion travels faster than the speed of light... ") and using that to arrived at other things might be consequences of SR/GR.

If you truly wish to learn about these things, what you ought to do is to learn some basic concepts of SR/GR first, and then ask about any validity of such astronomical explosion traveling faster than light. You will note that this is not a done deal and hopefully, you will not feel as secure to make that next leap based on the lack of evidence. It is difficult for us to counter something that is based on faulty assumptions in the first place, because the whole premise is moot. When you start with a faulty assumption, then almost any kind of outcome can be postulated (garbage in, garbage out).

I suggest you go to the Astronomy forum and investigate if such a claim about exploding stars, and then look up basic physics on special relativity.

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K