Breaking hard ground with motors

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
32 replies · 3K views
jbriggs444 said:
Are you contending that the use of the contraction "aren't" is proper while the full form "are not" is not?

Shirly you can't be serious.
according to grammarly it is
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You have not established that issues with agriculture in LDCs is due primarily to production.
You have not established that the issues with food production are limited by planting rate.
You have not established that planting rate in LDCs could be improved with robotics.
You have not established that even if planting rate in LDCs could be improved with robotics, that farmers in LDCs could buy them. If these are intended as charity, that robots are superior to equivalent cash donations.
You have not established that even if all the above were true that there exists battery technology to power this up.

But you're worried about the outer covering of these robots.
Do you understand why this does not look like you are being serious?