Breit Wigner Curve: Finding Reaction Rate from FWHM

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robsta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Wigner
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of a Breit Wigner curve in relation to reaction rates. It is established that the width of the curve correlates with the reaction rate, as derived from the uncertainty principle, specifically $$\Delta E \Delta t = \hbar$$. The participant seeks clarification on how energy translates into a reaction rate and the distinction between uncertainty in lifetime and actual lifetime. The conclusion is that $$\Delta t$$ effectively represents the lifetime of the reaction, albeit with a numerical factor involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Breit Wigner distribution
  • Familiarity with the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of decay rates and lifetimes in particle physics
  • Basic concepts of parity and angular momentum conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of the Breit Wigner formula
  • Study the implications of the uncertainty principle on particle lifetimes
  • Explore the conservation laws in particle decay processes
  • Investigate the role of numerical factors in quantum mechanical calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in particle physics, particularly those studying decay processes and reaction rates, as well as educators teaching quantum mechanics concepts.

Robsta
Messages
88
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've got a given Breit Wigner curve of the number of decays at given energies.

I've been told by several sources that the width (FWHM) of the curve gives the rate of the reaction.

I can't see however how an energy here actually translates into a rate.

Homework Equations



I understand that from the uncertainty principle $$ \Delta E \Delta t = \hbar $$ and therefore $$ \frac{\Delta E}{\hbar} = \Delta t $$ but to what does delta t refer? It seems to me like an uncertainty in the lifetime which is of course not what I'm after.

How would I find the actual lifetime rather than the error in the lifetime?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Attached is a picture of the relevant curves in case it adds anything. Although I've labelled the width Gamma I am aware that it's a graph of energy of decay against frequency of decay.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2302.JPG
    IMG_2302.JPG
    68.4 KB · Views: 899
I also have a question about the second part of the question visible in the image above. The question is "Use symmetry to explain why the neutral rho meson does not decay to two neutral pion".

My argument goes like this:

The parity of neutral rho is (-1) (since L=0). The parity of a neutral pi is also (-1). Therefore the parity of two neutral pions is therefore 1. So parity would not be conserved.
Also, the angular momentum of the neutral rho meson is 1 (L=0 S=1). And the angular momentum of the two neutral pions would be 0. So angular momentum would not be conserved.

Is the parity argument valid since parity is not necessarily conserved by the weak interaction? Is it for some reason safe to assume that it is conserved here?
 
Robsta said:

Homework Statement


I've got a given Breit Wigner curve of the number of decays at given energies.

I've been told by several sources that the width (FWHM) of the curve gives the rate of the reaction.

I can't see however how an energy here actually translates into a rate.

Homework Equations



I understand that from the uncertainty principle $$ \Delta E \Delta t = \hbar $$ and therefore $$ \frac{\Delta E}{\hbar} = \Delta t $$ but to what does delta t refer? It seems to me like an uncertainty in the lifetime which is of course not what I'm after.

How would I find the actual lifetime rather than the error in the lifetime?
The ##\Delta t## is basically the lifetime itself! (I say "basically" because there is some numerical factor).
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K