Briefer bumps Trouble from #1 bestseller spot (after a month)

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the recent changes in the Amazon bestseller rankings for popular science books, particularly focusing on Lee Smolin's "The Trouble with Physics" and Stephen Hawking's "A Briefer History of Time." Participants explore the implications of these rankings on public perception of physics and the influence of media coverage on book sales.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Smolin's book was supplanted by Hawking's work, indicating a shift in public interest.
  • Brian Greene's op-ed in the NY Times is discussed as a potential factor influencing the popularity of string theory books.
  • Participants speculate that the rankings reflect broader trends in public engagement with science literature.
  • There is mention of tracking the average rankings of string-oriented books to gauge shifts in interest over time.
  • Some participants express curiosity about the relevance of bestseller rankings to the understanding of public perception of science.
  • One participant suggests that the interplay between different authors' works might create a non-zero-sum dynamic in terms of public interest and sales.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the significance of the bestseller rankings and the impact of media on public interest in science. No consensus is reached on the implications of these observations.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the rankings are influenced by factors such as media coverage and public perception, but the discussion does not resolve the complexities surrounding these influences.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
Today at noon AFAIK for the first time in a month (since around 15 September) Smolin's book TTWP was not top bestseller on the Amazon physics list.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/14545/ref=pd_ts_b_ldr/102-1454980-4598542&tag=pfamazon01-20

The Trouble with Physics was supplanted by Stephen Hawking's A Briefer History of Time
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0553804367/?tag=pfamazon01-20
the hardcover edition by Bantam, which came out in September 2005.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Today (Oct. 20, 2006) Brian Greene has an op-ed piece in the NY Times justifiying continuing effort to develop string theory.
 
mathman said:
Today (Oct. 20, 2006) Brian Greene has an op-ed piece in the NY Times justifiying continuing effort to develop string theory.

thanks, mathman. I see the link is
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/20/opinion/20greenehed.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print

and just printed it off.

at the end it mentions his two books "Elegant" and "Fabric". Perhaps we will se a rise in their standing on the amazon physics list (which is already pretty high:smile: )

=============
EDIT actually as an afterthought we could watch for a blip. As of 4 PM today (20 Oct) pacific time the average standing of the 5 most popular string-oriented books on that list was 16. Let's see if it rises some in the next few days.
The 5, and their respective ranks on the Amazon physics list, were:

Greene Elegant 9
Kaku Parallel Worlds 10
Greene Fabric 14
Greene Elegant 15
Kaku Hyperspace 32

(paperback unless underlined to show the hardcover edition)
 
Last edited:
Perhaps I should wait for 4PM to look at that index but I got impatient and checked it as of 11 AM pacific time today (21 October) and it was 19.4

the 5 most popular string-oriented books on the Amazon list (with ranks) were

Greene Elegant 11
Greene Fabric 15
Kaku Parallel Worlds 21
Randall Warped Passages 23
Randall Warped Passages 27

underlining indicates the hardbound edition

Later today, at 4 PM pacific, the average was even higher: 13.6.

the 5 most popular stringy books (and their ranks) were

Greene Elegant 6
Greene Fabric 9
Kaku Parallel Worlds 10
Randall Warped Passages 20
Randall Warped Passages 23
 
Last edited:
Forgive me for asking but what is the relevance to which popular science books is on the number one list? :confused:
 
MeJennifer said:
Forgive me for asking but what is the relevance to which popular science books is on the number one list? :confused:

No problem!

I think it indicates something about the reading public---what sort of books people are reading (general audience, not specialist).

Actually if you are really interested in the reading public's perception of science, especially physics, you should probably scan over the whole amazon list. I think public perception of science is an integral part of the culture that supports science---there is more to say about this, if you are interested.

I find it fascinating. maybe you would too. have a look :smile:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/14545/ref=pd_ts_b_ldr/102-1454980-4598542&tag=pfamazon01-20
=================

Oh btw there are other reasons. I've discovered that book publishers seldom report how many copies of a given book they have sold.
One can however make rough guesses as to the quantity of copies out there by keeping track of the amazon lists. I don't want to get into that unless you are especially interested, though.

thanks for the question Jennifer :smile:
 
Last edited:
the reading public's response to the recent books and reviews in the media---all that stuff seems to have concerned some people at KITP, who have taken George Johnson in as "journalist in residence" and are having him explain the situation and advise them----there was a fascinating 1 hour talk he gave 20 October which is available as video.

thanks to Peter Woit for flagging it
http://online.itp.ucsb.edu/online/resident/johnson2/

I would actually recommend downloading it, if you can, rather than streaming, because then you have the Quicktime movie on your desktop (or whatever the appropriate format) and it does bear repeat viewing.
Interesting questions and comments from David Gross, Amanda Peet, and I think maybe Jim Hartle, and several others.

=================

to continue gauging the reading public response, as of Sunday 22 October at 7 AM (after the NYT OP-ED piece by Brian Greene, and several days of seemingly heightened buyer interest in stringy books) the Smolin book was back as #1 physics bestseller.

1. TwP
2. Hawking Briefer
3. Greene Elegant
...

the Greene book at #3 was the highest I have seen it in many weeks.
and the index (average rank of 5 most popular) was 15.8. In my rough estimation, this is comparatively high. A week or so ago it was fluctuating around 20-some IIRC. the generally high interest in string-oriented books is in line, I think, with Greene's Elegant rising to #3 spot.
=============

I suppose it could be that interest in string popularization and also in Smolin and Woit's discussion from a different perspective actually RE-INFORCE each other by stirring up interest! From the point of view of journalism and selling books, it is NOT ZERO SUM. I am not sure about this, certainly, and all I can do is watch the few meager indicators I have, unless someone can suggest some other sources of information.
===================
here is the average rank of the 5 most popular stringy books on the Amazon physics list for the past three days. always sampling at the same time, 4 PM pacific. I think there may have been a spike in sales right after Brian Greene's OP-ED piece (that mathman mentioned above). the op-ed piece did not mention Smolin or Woit and did not give their book titles---rather it discussed issues in general terms. But it made the case for continuing to favor string research and it gave the titles of two of Greene's books "Elegant" and "Fabric".
20 October 4 PM 16.0
21 October 4 PM 13.6
22 October 4 PM 21.8
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K