Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

British prince on the front line- agreed media silence.

  1. Feb 28, 2008 #1

    matthyaouw

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/7269743.stm
    My emphasis.

    This worries me. While I understand the potential security risk of letting the enemy know the whereabouts of the prince, I question the practice of an agreed media silence. Should the MoD, royal family or government have the power to stop the media reporting an important story? Not so much with regard to this circumstance, but in general. Who gets to decide what we find out and what we don't? I don't want to see the day when bad news is simply buried and denied.

    What are people's thoughts?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 28, 2008 #2

    f95toli

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I think the emphasis here should be on deal. The media was not forced to do anything. They merely agreed not to broadcast/print anything as long as Harry was in Afghanistan.
    The "carrot" was of course the interviews he has been giving the whole time, which you can now see on TV, and which were orignally meant to be broadcast after his deployment has ended (April).
    I find it VERY hard to believe that the tabloids would have agreed to this if it wasn't for the fact that they knew that they would be able to sell more copies in the long run.
    I suspect Murdoch&co are as upset as the MoD about the fact that the news were leaked prematurely.
     
  4. Feb 28, 2008 #3

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    It is very common for the media to cooperate with a government during a time of crisis/war (it happens in the US, too). F95toli is right - the key is that they do it by choice, not by coercion.
     
  5. Feb 28, 2008 #4

    turbo

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    The silence of the media was for good reason. They agreed that Harry would be a high-value target, and the Taliban might make special efforts to take him out. The concentrated attention on his unit would place all members of his unit at higher-than-normal risk for death and injury. I expect that they will send him back home or put him in some less-dangerous support position to reduce the risks to him and the members of his unit.
     
  6. Feb 28, 2008 #5

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    My thoughts exactly.
     
  7. Feb 28, 2008 #6

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    turbo-1 is right. Knowledge of his whereabouts by the Taliban puts the soldiers under him in great danger.
     
  8. Feb 28, 2008 #7

    Art

    User Avatar

    There's been a lot of media interest in Afghanistan recently in the UK following an award winning documentary 'Ross Kemp in Afghanistan' all of which would now seem to be a prelude to this story about Prince Harry. Was this documentary shown in the US?
     
  9. Feb 28, 2008 #8
    I think that him serving this way is so impressive next to all of the U.S. senators, etc. whose kids avoid the draft and military service so frequently. Way to go Prince Harry. Good choice of the Gurkhas too in a valiant effort to keep it under wraps…
     
  10. Feb 28, 2008 #9

    Art

    User Avatar

    When in Britain the security services go to great lengths to ensure nobody gets a sample of his DNA. I wonder if the same precautions were in place in Afghanistan or will some squaddy make himself a fortune selling it to the tabloid press.

    The reason they were after his DNA was to establish if there was any truth to the rumour he was fathered by James Hewitt (Captain Underpants) with whom Diana was having an affair around the time of Harry's conception and who like Harry had striking red hair.
     
  11. Feb 28, 2008 #10

    lisab

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Not that I know of, Art.

    Like CQ, I admire him very much for not taking the easy road. Too bad this story leaked - it must be very frustrating for him.
     
  12. Feb 28, 2008 #11

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    He was called the "bullet magnet" by his fellow soldiers. Yes, this is unfair and dangerous to the rest of the troops.

    Prince Harry is a little scary. I heard him quoted as saying that now all of his dreams have come true. Given that he was only there for a few months, it sounds to me like his real motive was to prove himself to others rather than serving out of a sense of duty to country or cause - he was willing to risk the lives of others in order to impress his friends and family.

    Note that he didn't travel with the rest of the troops. Instead, he rode around in a special helicopter.
     
    Last edited: Feb 29, 2008
  13. Feb 29, 2008 #12

    matthyaouw

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I know the media agreed and weren't forced, but I wonder what else they could be convinced to agree on if it was deemed to be 'for the best'. I also wonder whether it would have been so bad to release the fact that he was going to the front line, but just keep quiet about the location and regiment. That would still make him impossible to target.
     
  14. Feb 29, 2008 #13
    To be honest, I feel bad for the guy. He obviously wanted to be there, and now because of the media attention, he is going to have to leave. He must be very angry, and I wouldn't blame him. He didn't ask to be born a prince and have the status he has. All the guy wants is to be normal and be treated like anyone else.
     
  15. Feb 29, 2008 #14
    Don't give Harry more importance than he has. His death would be purely symbolic... what does he worth aside of being known for being known? Is he aware of some kind of military secret? Is playing polo considered politic? Is he some kind of supersoldier than makes him more efficient than Sunderland's first yobs? His death would be totaly irrelevant and he is no more important than Paris Hilton's.


    He could make a good bait though, how many terrorists would be ready to endanger their lives to kill him (and what for)?
     
  16. Feb 29, 2008 #15

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I suspect because of who he is, Taliban and insurgents/terrorists would try harder to kill him than others. On the other hand, for the most part, he is no more danger than any other soldier in the field.

    I'm puzzled as to why it seems acceptable to put any young soldier at risk as opposed to a celebrity.

    I admire him for serving as opposed to avoiding service like so many political leaders. At least he can argue that he would not be asking a soldier to do something he hadn't done himself, which is not case for politicians like Bush or Cheney.
     
  17. Feb 29, 2008 #16
    I guess some talibans could focus on him (which would expose them more because he is certainly well defended) but I guess talibans with brains would rather try to get his commander.

    PS: at least Cheney and Bush are deciders in that their loss could bring confusions in the states, at least for a moment. That cannot be said about Harry.
     
  18. Feb 29, 2008 #17
    It is not only that they would want to kill him,;more likely they would want to capture him for ransom. The British government doesn't want to deal with the scenario of Harry being held hostage by the Taliban. Talk about a media circus, that would be insane!
     
  19. Feb 29, 2008 #18

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Harry has been removed. What is wrong with the media that leaked this, do they have no brains or scruples? That's a rhetorical question, btw.
     
  20. Feb 29, 2008 #19

    lisab

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It was reportedly leaked on the Drudge Report. :rolleyes:

    I don't think silencing the media in a war theater is the same as muzzling the press on other issues. Even without a prince on the front lines, there may be information that the media have access to which needs to be kept secret...troop positions and numbers, weapon capability...that sort of thing.
     
  21. Feb 29, 2008 #20

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Prince Harry Finds Anonymity in Afghanistan
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=87792380
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: British prince on the front line- agreed media silence.
  1. Idiot media! (Replies: 33)

  2. Media & Politics (Replies: 44)

  3. The British are coming (Replies: 10)

Loading...