Broken symmetry in ferromagnetism

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of broken symmetry in ferromagnetism, specifically referencing P.W. Anderson's assertion that the ground state of ferromagnetic systems is an eigenstate of the spin rotation operator, thus lacking Goldstone modes. Participants express confusion regarding the relationship between spin waves and Goldstone modes, with additional references to contrasting views from Peierls and Kaplan. The uniqueness of the ground state and the notion of a tower of states are highlighted as fundamental to spontaneous symmetry breaking, with the discussion noting that ferromagnetism's degenerate ground state is special due to its eigenstate characteristics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and eigenstates
  • Familiarity with concepts of symmetry breaking and Goldstone modes
  • Knowledge of ferromagnetism and spin waves
  • Basic grasp of Hamiltonian mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study P.W. Anderson's theories on symmetry in quantum systems
  • Explore the implications of Goldstone modes in condensed matter physics
  • Research the concept of tower of states in quantum field theory
  • Examine the differences between classical and quantum symmetry breaking
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in condensed matter physics, quantum mechanics, and theoretical physics, will benefit from this discussion, as well as students seeking to understand the complexities of symmetry breaking in ferromagnetic systems.

jean194
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Today I found this paper and this one where P.W. Anderson says that there is no broken symmetry in ferromagnetism because the ground state is an eigenstate of the spin rotation operator. And so we don't have in this system Goldstone's mode for example.
But I thought spin waves were Goldstone's mode of ferromagnetic systems. So I'm a little confused, especially since in the second article Peierls and Kaplan do not seem to agree with Anderson.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jean194
Thanks, the pdf is very interesting.
Tell me if I'm wrong but from what I understand, the uniqueness of the ground state and the notion of tower of states is fundamental in spontaneous symmetry breaking. The case of ferromagnetism is special in the sense that the ground state is degenerate and is an eigenvector of the Hamiltonian. So in this sense the symmetry is not broken.

Now I'm trying to make the connection with symmetry breaking in electroweak theory; I can't see where the notion of tower of states appears in the latter case.
 
This tower of states is rather a special topic of one of the authors.
The ground state of macroscopic systems is always highly degenerate in the thermodynamic limit and by its very definition is an eigenvector of the hamiltonian.
My favourite article on the subject is by Rudolf Haag:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02731446

In the case of ferromagnetism, it is also an eigenstate of one of the generators of the broken symmetry, which makes it somewhat special. As is explained in the article, this leads, for example, to a reduced number of Goldstone bosons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jean194
Thanks I will read that.
 
Here is another article (that has an author in common with the article above).
https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0609177
Footnote 1`1: Notice that ferromagnetism is explicitly not included in this list. The ferromagnet has a large number of possible exact groundstates which are all precisely degenerate, and which all have a finite magnetization. The singling out of one of these eigenstates is in a sense more like classical symmetry breaking than like the quantum symmetry breaking discussed here. The quantum symmetry breaking causes a state which is not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian to be realized, and thus goes much further than only singling out one particular eigenstate.
 
I am not sure whether this statement about "not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian" is correct. We are talking here about phases, which usually require the idealisation of systems of infinite extent. But in infinite systems, also broken symmetry states are eigenstates of a Hamiltonian.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
26
Views
9K