I Broken symmetry in ferromagnetism

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on P.W. Anderson's assertion that ferromagnetism does not exhibit broken symmetry because its ground state is an eigenstate of the spin rotation operator, challenging the notion that spin waves are Goldstone modes. Participants express confusion over this claim, particularly in light of differing views from Peierls and Kaplan. The uniqueness of the ground state and the concept of a tower of states are debated, with emphasis on how ferromagnetism's degenerate ground state complicates the symmetry breaking narrative. The conversation also touches on the implications for electroweak theory and the nature of eigenstates in macroscopic systems. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the nuanced relationship between symmetry breaking and the characteristics of ferromagnetic systems.
jean194
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Today I found this paper and this one where P.W. Anderson says that there is no broken symmetry in ferromagnetism because the ground state is an eigenstate of the spin rotation operator. And so we don't have in this system Goldstone's mode for example.
But I thought spin waves were Goldstone's mode of ferromagnetic systems. So I'm a little confused, especially since in the second article Peierls and Kaplan do not seem to agree with Anderson.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jean194
Thanks, the pdf is very interesting.
Tell me if I'm wrong but from what I understand, the uniqueness of the ground state and the notion of tower of states is fundamental in spontaneous symmetry breaking. The case of ferromagnetism is special in the sense that the ground state is degenerate and is an eigenvector of the Hamiltonian. So in this sense the symmetry is not broken.

Now I'm trying to make the connection with symmetry breaking in electroweak theory; I can't see where the notion of tower of states appears in the latter case.
 
This tower of states is rather a special topic of one of the authors.
The ground state of macroscopic systems is always highly degenerate in the thermodynamic limit and by its very definition is an eigenvector of the hamiltonian.
My favourite article on the subject is by Rudolf Haag:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02731446

In the case of ferromagnetism, it is also an eigenstate of one of the generators of the broken symmetry, which makes it somewhat special. As is explained in the article, this leads, for example, to a reduced number of Goldstone bosons.
 
  • Like
Likes jean194
Thanks I will read that.
 
Here is another article (that has an author in common with the article above).
https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0609177
Footnote 1`1: Notice that ferromagnetism is explicitly not included in this list. The ferromagnet has a large number of possible exact groundstates which are all precisely degenerate, and which all have a finite magnetization. The singling out of one of these eigenstates is in a sense more like classical symmetry breaking than like the quantum symmetry breaking discussed here. The quantum symmetry breaking causes a state which is not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian to be realized, and thus goes much further than only singling out one particular eigenstate.
 
I am not sure whether this statement about "not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian" is correct. We are talking here about phases, which usually require the idealisation of systems of infinite extent. But in infinite systems, also broken symmetry states are eigenstates of a Hamiltonian.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K