Bullet passes through block - conservation of momentum

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a bullet after it passes through a stationary block and hits a person. Using conservation of momentum and the work-energy principle, the calculated velocity of the bullet is approximately 121.65 m/s, with some variations based on the gravitational constant used. Participants note the importance of precision in calculations, as small errors can significantly affect results. There is skepticism about the bullet's ability to pass through a 1.5 kg block without losing more velocity. Overall, the analysis is deemed correct, but the physical feasibility of the scenario is questioned.
danielamartins
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There's a stationary block (m1=1,5kg) in a table (Coefficient of Friction=0,4). A bullet passes through the block and hits a person. The block moved 1,2m. Calculate the velocity of the bullet (mb=0,0079kg and vib=709,88m/s) when it hit the person.


Homework Equations


W(f) = ΔKE

Pix=Px

The Attempt at a Solution



W(f) = ΔKE

v1 - velocity of the block after being hit by the bullet
μ - coefficient of friction = 0,4
d - distance - 1,2 m

- m1×g×μ×d=0- 1/2×m1×v1^2

v1= 3.098 m/s

Then, mb= 0,0079kg and vib=709,88 m/s:
By conservation of momentum:
Pix=Px
p(ix,b)+p(ix,1)= p(x,b)+ p(x,1)
mb×vib+m1×vi1=mb×vb+m1×v1

vb= 121,65 m/s

So, basically, this is what I did. I had to make up the values for the mass of the block and for the distance it traveled.
The thing is, is this analysis right? Because slowing down that much after passing through a block of wood doesn't seem right. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

Your work looks correct to me.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks! I appreciate it ;)
 
I assume you're using g = 10 ms^-2. I get 121.58 ms^-1.
 
Yes, I'm using g=10m/s^2
 
Since the given data are expressed to several significant figures, I would use a more precise value for g. The calculation involves taking the difference of two large numbers to obtain a rather smaller one, so a small error in an input can produce a relatively large error in the result. With g = 9.8 ms-2 I get 127.5m/s.
The answer could indeed be that low. A bullet might not go right through a 1.5kg block of wood.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K