Bullet Velocities: Jet Firing 600mph Bullets

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jjd3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of bullet velocities when fired from a jet traveling at 600 mph. Participants explore the implications of relative motion, the effects of external forces on bullet trajectory, and historical anecdotes related to aircraft and gun design. The scope includes conceptual reasoning and technical explanations regarding speed, drag, and bullet behavior in flight.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires whether a bullet fired forward from a jet traveling at 600 mph would travel at 1200 mph or stop upon exit.
  • Another participant asserts that, due to the relative nature of speed, the bullet would travel at 1200 mph forward or 0 mph backward, depending on the direction of fire.
  • Several participants note that once the bullet exits the barrel, it begins to decelerate due to external forces such as air resistance and gravity.
  • One participant speculates that a bullet fired at a higher speed may experience different aerodynamic effects, potentially leading to tumbling in turbulent air, which could affect its range and accuracy.
  • A participant mentions that aircraft guns are designed to avoid the risk of the aircraft flying into its own bullet trail, highlighting the high muzzle velocity of aircraft guns.
  • Another participant shares a historical anecdote about WWII aircraft and the challenges of firing while in a dive, questioning the validity of such claims.
  • One participant discusses the vector nature of forces on the bullet and the implications of relative speeds for both the bullet and the aircraft.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the bullet slows down after leaving the muzzle and raises the possibility of the aircraft catching up to the bullet under certain conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the behavior of bullets fired from a jet, with some agreeing on the principles of relative speed while others introduce complexities related to drag and bullet dynamics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these factors on bullet performance and aircraft safety.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about speed, drag, and external forces, but these assumptions are not fully explored or agreed upon. The discussion includes historical references that may not be universally accepted.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in the physics of motion, aerodynamics, military aviation history, and the technical aspects of firearms may find this discussion relevant.

jjd3
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello to all. I am merely looking out of interest peeked by a friend who asked me,mistakenly thinking I am smart enough to answer, this particular question. (probably very simple for you guys !) Here goes.
If you are flying a jet at say 600 mph and it has a weapon that fires a bullet forward at 600 mph,does the bullet come out of the barrel and just stop? or is it now traveling at 1200 mph upon exit?...how about if the gun fires rearward? Sorry if this seems well...I don't know ...but I have to ask ... Thanks ...

Jj...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since all speeds are relative and the speeds you are talking about are very small compared to the speed of light, ordinary addition applies. The bullet (forward or backward) will be traveling 600 mph relative to the jet. To get the ground speed of the bullet as it leaves the barrel, just add in the jet speed (+ or - as needed). The net result is 1200 mph forward and 0 mph backward.
 
the moment the bullet comes out of the barrel is the moment when it starts decelerating right
 
noagname said:
the moment the bullet comes out of the barrel is the moment when it starts decelerating right

If it is subject to outside forces. Ordinarily these include air resistance and gravity.
 
noagname said:
the moment the bullet comes out of the barrel is the moment when it starts decelerating right

Yes. And the fact that it comes out in one instance at 1200 means that it will slow down much faster than the one at 600 due to wind resistance. It will STILL go farther than the one at 600, but not twice as far. I'd SWAG it at about 72% farther, but would want to see some hard data.

Just a thought though in the same vein, a bullet has a given length. If it is moving so fast that the harmonic of it's wavefront is such that it is less than the length of the bullet itself I would not be surprised to find that in turbulent air the bullet itself might be induced to tumble even spinning in a fashion akin to gymbal lock. Which, obviously, would drastically reduce its effectiveness, range, and accuracy.
 
No sane person would design an aircraft gun that would risk the aircraft flying into it's own bullet trail. The muzzle velocity of aircraft guns is very high. Also when in a dog fight, if the bullets are fired with significant upward component, or the pilot isn't sure, the pilot is supposed to keep pulling back on the stick after firing has stopped to avoid flying into a stream of bullets.
 
To my understanding ,as per an old work friend of mine that was in WWII, that problem existed back then ,even w/ prop driven aircraft.He claims that they could do this in a
'diving ' dog-fight situation. I never really believed that claim but now I find it interesting, it being mentioned here at all. Interesting thread indeed .
I should try to locate and call my friend,it's been a long time.He may even be gone by now. ...Jj
 
jjd3 said:
To my understanding ,as per an old work friend of mine that was in WWII, that problem existed back then ,even w/ prop driven aircraft.He claims that they could do this in a
'diving ' dog-fight situation. I never really believed that claim but now I find it interesting, it being mentioned here at all. Interesting thread indeed .
I should try to locate and call my friend,it's been a long time.He may even be gone by now. ...Jj

I thought what was a problem was firing while keeping the propeller engines? Someone devised a way to time the MG to fire between each turn of the main fan.

Linearly, you'd add the velocities and assuming they don't catch up, no problem. The problem only comes if you have to describe the force on the bullet as a vector.

600mph relative to the plane, 1200mph relative to an observer on the ground.
 
wysard said:
Just a thought though in the same vein, a bullet has a given length. If it is moving so fast that the harmonic of it's wavefront is such that it is less than the length of the bullet itself I would not be surprised to find that in turbulent air the bullet itself might be induced to tumble even spinning in a fashion akin to gymbal lock. Which, obviously, would drastically reduce its effectiveness, range, and accuracy.

ok i got it until the harmonic part

if a pilot is shooting and the bullets are going a lot faster then why should he have to pull up
and does anyone know what speed they go at?
 
  • #10
One thing to consider in this discussion:

The bullet after it leaves the muzzle is slowing down...

The aircraft has the ability, via its propulsion, to keep its speed constant, speed up or slow down…

If the bullet has sufficient drag, upon leaving the muzzle, it may slow down sufficiently for the aircraft to catch it or pass through the bullet grouping…
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K