Bungee jump | simple harmonic motion

AI Thread Summary
A bungee jump involves a cord that stretches from its natural length of 75 meters to 83 meters when a person is attached. The discussion centers on when the cord goes slack, with some arguing it occurs when the length is less than 75 meters, while others believe it should be less than 83 meters due to the weight of the jumper. Clarification reveals that the cord remains taut as long as it is stretched beyond 75 meters, regardless of the jumper's weight. The tension in the cord decreases as the length approaches 75 meters, leading to the conclusion that slack occurs below this threshold. Understanding the mechanics of tension and stretching is crucial for grasping the dynamics of bungee jumping.
DarkEnergy890
Messages
14
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Bungee jump | simple harmonic motion
Relevant Equations
No maths involved
As you all know, a bungee jump is where a person is tied to a cord and the person jumps off and bounces up again.

The natural length of a cord is 75 metres. Then when a person is attached onto the cord, the length becomes 83 metres when the person is at rest. I am sure that the person is not executing simple harmonic motion because the cord goes slack at some point. My question is that does the cord go slack when the length of the cord is < 75 metres, or when the length of the cord is < 83 metres?

In the solutions it said that it goes slack when the cord is < 75 metres. However, it makes more sense to me that the cord goes slack < 83 metres because 83 metres was its natural length when the man is attached on to the cord (due to the man's weight). Any help with understanding this is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome, @DarkEnergy890 !

Why the difference between 83 and 75 meters?
Why not more or less than that value?
What would it be for a heavier or lighter person?
 
Think about tension in the cord and how it relates to slack.
 
Lnewqban said:
Welcome, @DarkEnergy890 !

Why the difference between 83 and 75 meters?
Why not more or less than that value?
What would it be for a heavier or lighter person?
Hi, thanks for the reply. Sorry if my question was unclear. The length is 75m if nobody is on it. Then when a "certain human" is attached the length increases to 83m.

Edit: Ah, I see what you mean. When the person is attached to the cord the cord has already been stretched. So no matter what the weight of the person is as long as the length is > 75m then the cord will not go slack, but rather it will "decompress".
 
DarkEnergy890 said:
Edit: Ah, I see what you mean. When the person is attached to the cord the cord has already been stretched. So no matter what the weight of the person is as long as the length is > 75m then the cord will not go slack, but rather it will "decompress".
Precisely!
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes DarkEnergy890
DarkEnergy890 said:
Hi, thanks for the reply. Sorry if my question was unclear. The length is 75m if nobody is on it. Then when a "certain human" is attached the length increases to 83m.

Edit: Ah, I see what you mean. When the person is attached to the cord the cord has already been stretched. So no matter what the weight of the person is as long as the length is > 75m then the cord will not go slack, but rather it will "decompress".
Exactly!
At 76 meters, there is still some fraction of the weight force acting on the cord and stretching it a little.
At 74 meters, the cord does not “feel” anything attached to any of its ends.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes DarkEnergy890
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'

Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'

Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
View full post »

Similar threads

Derivation of the oscillation period for a vertical mass-spring system
Replies
9
Views
4K
Bungee jumping and Conservation of energy
Replies
3
Views
2K
Final amplitude with damping of bungee cord
Replies
8
Views
3K
Speed and apparent weight of person in reverse bungee jumping
Replies
9
Views
2K
How Does a Bungee Jumper's Energy Change During a Jump?
Replies
14
Views
6K
Acceleration vs Time Bungee Graph
Replies
1
Views
5K
Finding Max Velocity For Simple Harmonic Spring problem?
Replies
11
Views
4K
What is the best way to approach solving this bungee jumping problem?
Replies
6
Views
3K
Physics of Bungee Jumping problem?
Replies
16
Views
5K
What is the spring constant for the bungee cord used in the given scenario?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top