Bungee Jumping (Finding distance and spring constant)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a bungee jumping scenario involving a jumper, Kate, who steps off a bridge. The problem involves calculating the distance she will hang below the bridge and determining the spring constant of the bungee cord, which behaves like an ideal spring once stretched. The context includes considerations of gravitational forces and spring mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of Hooke's law and conservation of energy to find the distance Kate hangs below the bridge and the spring constant. There are attempts to relate forces and energy equations, with some questioning the definitions of variables and the relationships between them.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing various approaches and calculations. Some have identified potential errors in their reasoning, while others are refining their understanding of the relationships between the forces involved. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the setup and the equations to use, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between the unstretched length of the bungee cord and the amount it stretches. There is also mention of assumptions regarding the absence of dissipative forces and the treatment of Kate as a point particle.

jheld
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Kate, a bungee jumper, wants to jump off the edge of a bridge that spans a river below. Kate has a mass m, and the surface of the bridge is a height h above the water. The bungee cord, which has length L when unstretched, will first straighten and then stretch as Kate falls.

Assume the following:

The bungee cord behaves as an ideal spring once it begins to stretch, with spring constant .
Kate doesn't actually jump but simply steps off the edge of the bridge and falls straight downward.
Kate's height is negligible compared to the length of the bungee cord. Hence, she can be treated as a point particle.

Use g for the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity.

How far below the bridge will Kate eventually be hanging, once she stops oscillating and comes finally to rest? Assume that she doesn't touch the water. solve d using the measurements that you were given.

And;
If Kate just touches the surface of the river on her first downward trip (i.e., before the first bounce), what is the spring constant ? Ignore all dissipative forces. (k in terms of L, h, m and g)


Homework Equations


F = ma
Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2a(delta s)
1/2k(L^2)
spring equilibrium = 1/2k(delta s)^2


The Attempt at a Solution


i got d = sqrt(m*2*g*L/k), but that was wrong.

the answer is (mg +kL)/k, though I'm not sure why. and I'm not sure how to go about part 2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part 1, apply Hooke's law to find out how much the cord stretches.

For part 2, apply conservation of energy.
 
i tried doing Fspring = -k(delta s)2 converting it into = -kL^2. i think that's the right way to do it. but, still not sure.

my final velocity squared will 2mgL. i bring that into the kinetic energy equation k = 1/2mv^2. so kinetic energy = 2/2*m(gL) ---> mgL. is that right?

then hooke's law is -ks^2. is my s = L ?.
how would i bring these two equations together?
 
jheld said:
i tried doing Fspring = -k(delta s)2 converting it into = -kL^2. i think that's the right way to do it. but, still not sure.
That's not Hooke's law! Read this: Hooke's Law. Also, don't confuse the amount of stretch and L. (L is the unstretched length of the cord.)

I think you're confusing Hooke's law (F = -kx), which relates spring force with stretch, with the formula for spring potential energy (SPE = ½kx²), which also depends on the stretch.
 
Coming back to this problem (now that I have some time on my hands).

Hooke's Law: F_spring = -k(delta s)

delta s = s - L (i think)
unfortunately in finding s, i get mg/k + L, which gives F_spring = mg, which i don't think is right.

conservation of energy:
K_i + U_gi + U_si = K_f + U_gf + U_sf
K_i = (1/2)(m)(v)^2

v = sqrt(2gL)
K_i = (1/2)(m)(sqrt(2gL))^2
= mgL. is this right? I think it is.

U_gi = mgh
h = L
U_gi = mgL. is this right? I think it is.

U_si = (1/2)k(delta s)
delta s = (L - L) = 0
U_si = 0. I know this is correct, and I understand why.

K_f = (1/2)mv^2
v = 0
K_f = 0. I think this is right.

U_gf = mg(delta s)
though from earlier, it seems my delta s (after bungee reaches length L and start stretching), is wrong, so I'm not sure how to handle this.

in the end (without completing everything):
K_i + U_gi = U_sf
2mgL = U_sf

Once I get the delta s correct, how do I find the length, though?
 
I think I was thinking too deeply in this problem and didn't truly realize the things that I did have.

I already have part of the total distance, it is length of the unstretched rope, L.

And F_spring = -k(delta s).

delta s is the amount the rope will stretch from its unstretched length (technically the restoring force that holds the final length (from length L) with Kate of mass m, on it) to its final length.

ma = 0
0 = -k(delta s) + mg
k(delta s) = mg
delta s = (mg)/k.

therefore the total distance Kate will be at will be d = (mg)/k + L.
 
Good! Now it's time to tackle part 2.
 
Okay.

So, I have chosen to make Ei to be before she 'jumps'. energy is conserved, it is an enclosed system. and I have chosen her to be standing at y = 0, to make my remaining calculations easier.
therefore,
(1/2)m(0)^2 + mg(0) + (1/2)k(0 - 0) = 0

Ef (touching the water at the bottom before springing up (so, elastic potential energy and gravitational energy are both at work)
Ef:
(1/2)m(0)^2 + mg(-h) + (1/2)k(h - L)^2

Ei = Ef
0 = -mgh + (1/2)k(h-L)^2
k = mgh(2)/(h-L)^2
Does this look right?
 
Looks good!
 

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K