Buoancy (block floating in water)

  • Thread starter Thread starter etagg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Floating Water
Click For Summary
A block of wood initially floats with 90% of its volume submerged in water. When oil with a density of 875 kg/m³ is poured over the block, the fraction submerged in water is expected to decrease. The user initially set up the buoyancy equations correctly but made a mistake by incorrectly factoring the submerged volume. After realizing the error, they acknowledged that prolonged focus on the problem led to confusion. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful calculations in buoyancy problems.
etagg
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Im confused by this question:

A block of wood floats above water with 90% of its volume submerged. Oil with a density of 875kg/m^3 is then poured over the block so that it covers the entire block. Find the fraction of the block now submerged in water.

I know that the fraction of the block submerged will decrease.
I started by recognizing that the initial force of buoyancy is equal to the final force of buoyancy

ρ_w g(0.9)V=ρ_w gxV+ρ_o g(1-x)V

Where the V and g cancel out, and the x is equal to the portion of the volume submerged in the water and the oil.
However, when i use this method, x equals 0.9, meaning that the same amount of the block is submerged in the water, when it should be less of the block is submerged in the water.
Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
etagg said:
I started by recognizing that the initial force of buoyancy is equal to the final force of buoyancy

ρ_w g(0.9)V=ρ_w gxV+ρ_o g(1-x)V
OK.

Where the V and g cancel out, and the x is equal to the portion of the volume submerged in the water and the oil.
x is the fraction of the block submerged in water.
However, when i use this method, x equals 0.9, meaning that the same amount of the block is submerged in the water, when it should be less of the block is submerged in the water.
Please show how you solved for x.
 
ohhhh, what a stupid mistake. I mistakenly factored 0.9 when i should not have. Goes to show what happens when you look at a problem for too long!
thanks for your help.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K