Buoyancy of object on telescopic riser with only part of its bottom in water

  • Thread starter Thread starter bchohertz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the buoyancy of a submerged cube attached to the floor by a telescopic cylinder, which occupies part of the cube's bottom surface area. It is established that buoyant force is determined by the volume of water displaced rather than the surface area in contact with water. The presence of the cylinder means that the cube will need to be submerged deeper to displace enough water to equal its weight, as the cylinder occupies space that would otherwise be filled by water. Additionally, the pressure gradient in the water affects the buoyant force, as less surface area in contact with water requires a greater pressure to achieve the same upward force. Ultimately, the buoyancy effect is not diminished as long as any part of the cube's bottom is submerged.
bchohertz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If a cube submerged in water is attached to the floor with a telescopic cylinder taking up part of the surface area on the bottom of the cube, will the buoyant upward force be a fraction of the surface area on the bottom of the cube exposed to water, or will the full buoyancy effect take place, as long as at least a little of the bottom surface area of the cube is exposed.

Assume the cube is less dense than the water it is in.
Assume the telescopic cylinder does not create any tensive or vacuum force, and is ridgid. It is just preventing some of the water from contacting part of the bottom surface of the cube.

From what I have read on the forums, if the ENTIRE bottom of the cube is not in contact with water the cube will have NO buoyant uplift. My question is what if only part of the bottom surface of the cube is in contact with water? Do I calculate buoyant force normally and multiply by the fraction of bottom surface area that water comes in contact with? Or, does the entire normal Buoyant force get applied.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Buoyant force depends on displaced volume, not surface area. It won't change just because there's a cylinder attached (aside from any volume displaced by the cylinder).
 
bchohertz said:
If a cube submerged in water is attached to the floor with a telescopic cylinder taking up part of the surface area on the bottom of the cube, will the buoyant upward force be a fraction of the surface area on the bottom of the cube exposed to water, or will the full buoyancy effect take place, as long as at least a little of the bottom surface area of the cube is exposed.

I will refer to 'the basin' for the container of the body of water that the cube is floating in.

In a sense the cube you describe is not attached to the floor of the basin; your statement about the cilinder implies it exerts neither an upward nor a downward force. All that the cilinder does is prevent sideways motion.

We have that in order to float the cube must display its weight in water. It follows that the cube-with-cilinder will be immersed more deeply than the same cube without cilinder. The volume taken up by the cilinder is not available for water being displaced.

Alternatively, you can evaluate the buoyancy by considering pressure gradient. In a fluid like water there is a pressure gradient; the pressure increases linearly with depth. The bottom of the cube is below the surface, the pressure acting upon the bottom of the cube provides the required upward force for buoyancy. As you describe: with the cilinder in place there is less surface area available. Force is pressure times surface area. Less surface area means a larger pressure is required to obtain the same amount of force.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top