Buoyancy of object on telescopic riser with only part of its bottom in water

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bchohertz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the buoyancy of a cube partially submerged in water, attached to the floor via a telescopic cylinder. It is established that the buoyant force acting on the cube is determined by the volume of water displaced, not merely the surface area in contact with water. The presence of the cylinder does not alter the buoyant force as long as some part of the cube's bottom remains submerged. However, the cylinder does limit the volume of water displaced, necessitating a deeper immersion of the cube to achieve equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Archimedes' principle
  • Knowledge of pressure gradients in fluids
  • Familiarity with buoyancy concepts
  • Basic principles of fluid mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Archimedes' principle in detail
  • Explore fluid pressure calculations and gradients
  • Research the effects of submerged objects on buoyancy
  • Investigate the role of surface area in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers working with fluid mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding buoyancy and its applications in submerged objects.

bchohertz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If a cube submerged in water is attached to the floor with a telescopic cylinder taking up part of the surface area on the bottom of the cube, will the buoyant upward force be a fraction of the surface area on the bottom of the cube exposed to water, or will the full buoyancy effect take place, as long as at least a little of the bottom surface area of the cube is exposed.

Assume the cube is less dense than the water it is in.
Assume the telescopic cylinder does not create any tensive or vacuum force, and is ridgid. It is just preventing some of the water from contacting part of the bottom surface of the cube.

From what I have read on the forums, if the ENTIRE bottom of the cube is not in contact with water the cube will have NO buoyant uplift. My question is what if only part of the bottom surface of the cube is in contact with water? Do I calculate buoyant force normally and multiply by the fraction of bottom surface area that water comes in contact with? Or, does the entire normal Buoyant force get applied.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Buoyant force depends on displaced volume, not surface area. It won't change just because there's a cylinder attached (aside from any volume displaced by the cylinder).
 
bchohertz said:
If a cube submerged in water is attached to the floor with a telescopic cylinder taking up part of the surface area on the bottom of the cube, will the buoyant upward force be a fraction of the surface area on the bottom of the cube exposed to water, or will the full buoyancy effect take place, as long as at least a little of the bottom surface area of the cube is exposed.

I will refer to 'the basin' for the container of the body of water that the cube is floating in.

In a sense the cube you describe is not attached to the floor of the basin; your statement about the cilinder implies it exerts neither an upward nor a downward force. All that the cilinder does is prevent sideways motion.

We have that in order to float the cube must display its weight in water. It follows that the cube-with-cilinder will be immersed more deeply than the same cube without cilinder. The volume taken up by the cilinder is not available for water being displaced.

Alternatively, you can evaluate the buoyancy by considering pressure gradient. In a fluid like water there is a pressure gradient; the pressure increases linearly with depth. The bottom of the cube is below the surface, the pressure acting upon the bottom of the cube provides the required upward force for buoyancy. As you describe: with the cilinder in place there is less surface area available. Force is pressure times surface area. Less surface area means a larger pressure is required to obtain the same amount of force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
27K
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K