Bush's Support of Torture: Global Impact and Un-American Reputation

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the implications of the Bush administration's interrogation policies, particularly in relation to the amendment proposed by Senator John McCain, which aims to prohibit "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment." The amendment seeks to establish the U.S. Army Field Manual as the standard for interrogations, amidst concerns that the administration may circumvent these restrictions through the use of non-military personnel. Participants express outrage over the treatment of detainees, drawing parallels between U.S. actions and historical atrocities, while debating the moral and legal ramifications of torture.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of U.S. military interrogation policies
  • Familiarity with the U.S. Army Field Manual
  • Knowledge of the legislative process regarding amendments
  • Awareness of historical contexts of torture and human rights violations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the McCain amendment on U.S. interrogation practices
  • Examine case studies of Abu Ghraib and other detention facilities
  • Investigate international laws regarding torture and human rights
  • Explore the historical context of U.S. foreign policy in Iraq and its consequences
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for human rights advocates, legal scholars, military personnel, and policymakers interested in the ethical implications of interrogation techniques and the impact of U.S. foreign policy on global perceptions of American values.

  • #181
This isn't torture, but along the lines of the larger topic of secret prisons and adherence to international law or conventions, how does this play for our global image?

How U.S. used Iraqi wives for ‘leverage’
Suspected insurgents' spouses jailed to force husbands to surrender
Associated Press
Updated: 3:39 p.m. ET Jan. 27, 2006

The U.S. Army in Iraq has at least twice seized and jailed the wives of suspected insurgents in hopes of “leveraging” their husbands into surrender, U.S. military documents show.

In one case, a secretive task force locked up the young mother of a nursing baby, a U.S. intelligence officer reported. In the case of a second detainee, one American colonel suggested to another that they catch her husband by tacking a note to the family’s door telling him “to come get his wife.”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11061831/

In reference to demands of the kidnappers of American journalist Jill Carroll, who threatened to kill her by last Friday unless all women prisoners were freed, this reflects poorly on the U.S.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
10K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K