By definition, is a unit considered an irreducible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werg22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Unit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between units and irreducibles in integral domains, exploring definitions and implications within the context of algebraic structures. Participants are examining whether a unit can be considered an irreducible element.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a unit is defined as an element with an inverse in an integral domain, while an irreducible cannot be factored without one factor being a unit.
  • One participant argues that since units like -1 and 1 are not primes, this suggests that units cannot be considered irreducibles.
  • Another participant highlights that the term "irreducible" is typically reserved for non-units and nonzero elements, referencing an external definition.
  • A later reply discusses the organization of elements in a domain into units and non-units, proposing that irreducibles are defined to understand non-units better.
  • There is mention of the hope for unique factorization into irreducibles under certain conditions, such as in a Noetherian domain, while acknowledging that units complicate uniqueness.
  • Participants explore the concept of greatest common divisors (gcds) as a key aspect of factorization in integral domains.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether a unit can be considered an irreducible. Multiple competing views are presented regarding definitions and implications.

Contextual Notes

Definitions of terms such as "unit" and "irreducible" are not fully established, leading to potential misunderstandings. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of factorization and the role of units in integral domains.

Werg22
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
1
Just need a yes or no.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You need to define your terms.
 
Integral said:
You need to define your terms.

I'm speaking of units and irreducibles in integral domains.
 
OK, so you have added an new term, and stil no definitions. ?
 
no, but one word answers are frustratingly not allowed here. so i had to enter it thrice.
 
Last edited:
In an integral domain, a unit is an element that has an inverse in the integral domain, that is when they are multiplied together, they give 1.

An irreducible is an element of an integral domain that cannot be factored without one of its factor being a unit.

For example when the integral domain in question are the integers, the units are -1 and 1 and the irreducibles are the primes.
 
I would say your last line confirms the answer no, since -1 and 1 are not primes.
 
I think the confusion resulted from the definition of "irreducible". This adjective is exclusive to non-units (and nonzero elements!); see for example http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/Irreducible.html .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yes werg omitted the part about an irreducible being a non unit.

in general think of how you want to understand a domain: you want to know how it differs from a field.
so first basic question: what are all the units?

second question: what are all the non units? hopefully there is some way to organize the non units, and one basic way is to define irreducibles, then hope to factor other elements into those.

so to undertstand non units we define irreducibles.

then we try to prove that under various simple hypotheses we can factor every non unit into irreducibles (e.g. noetherian domain)

then we hope for some uniqueness statement. obviously anything can be factored by any unit, so any uniqueness statement must akllow for this non uniqueness due to units.

sow ,e hope for a statement that factorization into irreducibles not only exists, but is unique except for an equivalence relation where multiplying by a unit is considered leaving things equivalent.

so we break the domain into two disjoint sets, units and non units. then the group of units acts on the multiplicatively closed set of non units. we consider elements of the same the equivalence class as "associates". then we try to factor non units into irreducibles, uniquely up to associates, which is not always possible.

i believe it is possible if the domain is noetherian, and it is possible to define gcd's of any two elements.

so a key concept is that of a gcd.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
11K