Why does the radius of a unit circle need to be 1?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The radius of the unit circle is defined as 1 to simplify the teaching of trigonometric functions and radians. This definition allows for the circumference to be expressed as 2π radians, facilitating easier calculations in trigonometry. The unit circle's radius being 1 also means that the sine and cosine of angles correspond directly to the coordinates of points on the circle, enhancing understanding of these functions. The choice of 1 as the radius is a matter of convention, providing a standard reference point for mathematical calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic trigonometric functions (sine, cosine)
  • Familiarity with radians and their relationship to angles
  • Knowledge of the properties of circles, including circumference and area
  • Basic mathematical conventions and definitions in geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of radians in depth, focusing on their application in trigonometry
  • Study the historical development of the unit circle and its significance in mathematics
  • Learn about the implications of using different radii in trigonometric calculations
  • Investigate the debate surrounding the use of π versus τ in mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics educators, students learning trigonometry, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of geometry and trigonometric functions.

  • #31
@hutchphd! Still here...just terribly busy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
gmax137 said:
I'm not sure what you're getting at here. I meant calipers like this (with parallel jaws). Squeeze and read the diameter. Much easier than measuring the radius of a given circle.
View attachment 269823
Oh, heck, I thought of regular (not necessarily with the spring and screw-wheel apparatus) outside calipers like this:

1601392725965.png
 
  • #33
sysprog said:
Oh, heck, I thought of regular (not necessarily with the spring and screw-wheel apparatus) outside calipers like this:

View attachment 270179
This type of caliper would work like the Vernier caliper shown in post #29. If the jaws of this caliper are set too close, the circle wouldn't fit between the jaws. Opening the jaws to a width so that they just barely accept the circle would give the diameter.
I'm assuming we have an object with circular cross section here, although you could also do the measurement reasonably well for a circle drawn on paper. Put one jaw at any point on the circumference, and adjust the caliper opening so that the other jaw intersects a single point as the caliper is rotated through an arc.
 
  • #34
I'm sorry, my post #26 was a distraction, intending to address the distraction that started around post #9, debating radius vs. diameter, and pi vs. 2*pi.
 
  • #35
Mark44 said:
Opening the jaws to a width so that they just barely accept the circle would give the diameter.
Isn't that still a series of trials? How do we find that we haven't exceeded the diameter? Don't we have to do repeated trials to find out exactly where "just barely" is?
 
  • #36
Mark44 said:
Put one jaw at any point on the circumference, and adjust the caliper opening so that the other jaw intersects a single point as the caliper is rotated through an arc.
This method makes good sense to me.
 
  • #37
of course the assumption that caliper measure equals ruler measure is equivalent to the Side angle side axiom of euclidean geometry.

Pardon me, I am entranced by a thread that goes on this long, in answer to OP's question of "why is 1 = 1?"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog, gmax137 and Mark44

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
68K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K