∑ C An =C ∑ An (n from 1 to infinity) ... why?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ShengyaoLiang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of series and the property that relates the summation of a constant multiplied by a series to the constant multiplied by the summation of the series. Participants explore the conditions under which this property holds and the definitions involved in proving it.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that if ∑ C An converges, then it follows that ∑ C An = C ∑ An, questioning the reasoning behind this property.
  • Another participant suggests that knowing the rigorous definition of convergence makes the property easy to prove.
  • A different participant proposes using partial sums to demonstrate the property, indicating that if the first series converges, the limit of its partial sums must exist and be finite.
  • One participant elaborates on the definition of the series and the application of the distributive law in the context of limits and partial sums.
  • Another participant acknowledges a mistake in their understanding, indicating a learning process.
  • There is a mention of a potential typo in a previous statement regarding the limits and sums, but it remains uncorrected.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of the property relating to the convergence of series, but the discussion includes varying levels of understanding and some confusion about the details of the proof.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of convergence and the properties of limits are not explicitly stated, which may affect the clarity of the discussion.

ShengyaoLiang
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
If ∑ C An (n from 1 to infinity) converges, and C in Real, then ∑ C An is convergent with :

∑ C An =C ∑ An (n from 1 to infinity) .. why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly is your question?
 
Well if you know the rigorous definition of convergence of series than the property is easy to prove.
 
write with s_n the partial sum of the first series that you are supposing that converges. We know that if it converges then the limit of its partial sum must exist and me finite. After that write with s'_n the partial sum of the second series, it obviously is equal to
s'_n=cs_n by taking the limit of this too, you can easily prove what you are looking for.
Do u understadn how to do it now?? This is only one way of doing it though.
 
Yes, that's correct. \sum_{n=0}^\infty CA_n is defined as the limit of the partial sums: \sum_{n=0}^\infty CA_n= \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} \sum_{n=0}^N CA_n. For each partial sum, the distributive law gives \sum_{n=0}^N CA_n= C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n and, of course, \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n= C\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks...hehe i did wrong...
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, that's correct. \sum_{n=0}^\infty CA_n is defined as the limit of the partial sums: \sum_{n=0}^\infty CA_n= \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} \sum_{n=0}^N CA_n. For each partial sum, the distributive law gives \sum_{n=0}^N CA_n= C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n and, of course, \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n= C\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} C\sum_{n=0}^N A_n= \sum_{n=0}^\infty A_n.
yeah halls at the very end meant this:

C\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} \sum_{n=0}^N A_n= C\sum_{n=0}^\infty A_n[/itex]<br /> <br /> but i am sure it was a typo, latex thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K