Calc 2 is punching me in the chest

  • Thread starter Thread starter CrunchBerries
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calc 2
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the challenges faced by students in Calculus II, particularly in mastering integration techniques such as u-substitution, integration by parts, and partial fractions. Participants emphasize the importance of practice and developing a narrative approach to problem-solving. They recommend resources like mathispower4u.com for additional insights and stress that integration is inherently less procedural than differentiation, making it more complex. The conversation highlights the anticipation of advanced topics like Taylor series and applications of integration, reinforcing the notion that perseverance leads to mastery.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, including differentiation and integration.
  • Familiarity with integration techniques such as u-substitution and integration by parts.
  • Knowledge of series and sequences, particularly Taylor series.
  • Ability to analyze and solve mathematical problems systematically.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the tabular method for integration by parts to simplify complex problems.
  • Practice various integration problems using resources like mathispower4u.com.
  • Study the applications of integration in physics and engineering contexts.
  • Review and practice Taylor series and their applications in calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Students enrolled in Calculus II, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to improve their integration skills and understanding of advanced calculus concepts.

CrunchBerries
Messages
58
Reaction score
8
I am taking calc 2 online, and am currently finishing the part on "Strategy for Integration", where all the u-sub/trigsub/partial fraction/by parts are combining into a problem set. They were already challenging on their own, but combining all these is very tricky haha! Definitely not high school math anymore.

Don't get me wrong, I like math and I am happy taking this course. I just want to vent and I figure some people here may relate. Sometimes I go through the material and I totally feel defeated. I do a problem, then I look at the answer in the solutions manual, and it feels like a gut punch when I get it wrong. And I mean not just "forgot to include the minus sign from somewhere" wrong, but "I bought a plane ticket to France and landed in Australia" wrong.

I know I will figure it out and maybe end up with a decent 'mark', but I have a LOT of work ahead of me.
 

Attachments

  • perplexed.jpg
    perplexed.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 351
Physics news on Phys.org
Try checking out the corresponding videos at

www.mathispower4u.com

where you can some insight from a different perspective on the problems.

They are short 10 min videos usually solving a specific problem.

With respect to the plane ticket, there was a story of some european researchers who booke a trip to Monterrey for a conference and wound up in Monterrey Mexico not Monterey California where the conference was.

Here's more:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/map-h...-the-wrong-flight-all-the-time_b_8160184.html
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CrunchBerries
Knowing which method to apply to an integration problem (substitution, partial fractions, integration by parts...) only comes with practice. After you have worked a lot of problems, you will get a feeling for which method to apply to a given case. But even then, it is often a trial and error process. You try one substitution...no that didn't help...what about this substitution?..well, that made it a little easier, now maybe I can use partial fractions... Anyway, my advice is practice, practice, practice.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint and CrunchBerries
Thanks guys, I'll have to review all this for my assignments/exam so I will be revisiting some of these tips.
 
Just learn to get back up and back out of blind alleys.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CrunchBerries
Sounds simply stupid, but take the questions you get wrong and just do them over and over. It's a bit of a combination of rote memory, understanding conceptually, and practicing the techniques/concepts. There might even be a tiny amount of muscle memory involved in writing it down, or at least the act of writing helps you somehow.

Calc II is a legitimate bugaboo for math students university wide, it seems. I don't know why it is consistently taught the same (bad) way year after year at every university.

However, it also happens to contain the most BEAUTIFUL things you will learn in calculus (like Taylor series and such). It's just impossible to appreciate them when you are feeling stupid about trying to do integration by parts.

Sounds like you are sufficiently motivated though. Good luck.

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr. Courtney and CrunchBerries
Oh, and one more thing... Since you are doing all these combinations, write out your problems a bit like a narrative or proof. "Using u-substitution - using integration by parts." Try to tell a story with your problem solving. Should make it more interesting and clear in your own mind.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela, TJGilb, jedishrfu and 2 others
I cannot wait for Taylor series! I was working on geometric series on my pre-calc course and thought there was something awesome about series and induction. I figure these get expanded on during that chapter. I think it will be a great cherry on the cake to end my course with.

Basically all the chapters ahead look very interesting; Applications of Integration (arc length, engineering/physics etc..), Differential Equations (Exponential growth), and finally Series and Sequences.

I will try narrating and see what happens. Also my studying habits do involve repeating some difficult problems.

When I took calc 1, there were times where I also felt similarly, and I did quite well with an A+. But this course seems to have more material to it and is more involved. I do prefer Calc 2 to Calc1 so far, but I do appreciate and embrace the fact that it is a notch above in a few ways.

Thanks for the input
 
CrunchBerries said:
I cannot wait for Taylor series! I was working on geometric series on my pre-calc course and thought there was something awesome about series and induction. I figure these get expanded on during that chapter. I think it will be a great cherry on the cake to end my course with.

Basically all the chapters ahead look very interesting; Applications of Integration (arc length, engineering/physics etc..), Differential Equations (Exponential growth), and finally Series and Sequences.

I will try narrating and see what happens. Also my studying habits do involve repeating some difficult problems.

When I took calc 1, there were times where I also felt similarly, and I did quite well with an A+. But this course seems to have more material to it and is more involved. I do prefer Calc 2 to Calc1 so far, but I do appreciate and embrace the fact that it is a notch above in a few ways.

Thanks for the input

Some people do not believe students when they say it - but Calc II -wherever it is taught - is notoriously difficult, even more so in some ways than the next level. There are any number of reasons for this we could probably spend a whole thread on.

I do appreciate that you are looking forward to the material though. That helps a lot.

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint and Dr. Courtney
  • #10
A major part of the difficulty is that, unlike differentiation, integration is less procedural. With practice, you get a variety of techniques down, but none of them are guaranteed to work. Differentiation, OTOH, is more-or-less straightforward, in that if you apply the rules correctly, you end up with the derivative.
 
  • #11
Interesting last couple of comments. Integration is like the inverse of differentiation. Differentiation goes in a less complicated way, but figuring out how to go back the other way 'seems harder'. This is like learning Multiplication and then find that learning Division is more unclear, with more things to think about and plan for.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
  • #12
Mark44 said:
A major part of the difficulty is that, unlike differentiation, integration is less procedural. With practice, you get a variety of techniques down, but none of them are guaranteed to work. Differentiation, OTOH, is more-or-less straightforward, in that if you apply the rules correctly, you end up with the derivative.

symbolipoint said:
Interesting last couple of comments. Integration is like the inverse of differentiation. Differentiation goes in a less complicated way, but figuring out how to go back the other way 'seems harder'. This is like learning Multiplication and then find that learning Division is more unclear, with more things to think about and plan for.

Very true. We could possibly pin this down somewhat formally by talking about the functions of differentiation and division on the set of real numbers...
 
  • #13
Solving those really hard problems now will make your life so much easier in the future. Also, in case you haven't been taught it, look up the tabular method for integration by parts (they never touched it in Calc 2 for me). I find it makes it so much easier in a lot of cases.
 
  • #14
TJGilb said:
Solving those really hard problems now will make your life so much easier in the future. Also, in case you haven't been taught it, look up the tabular method for integration by parts (they never touched it in Calc 2 for me). I find it makes it so much easier in a lot of cases.

That's pretty neat:

http://www.hyper-ad.com/tutoring/int_parts.htm

It will (it seems at least from the example) give the right answer, but I'm not sure how well it would go over on a test. I'd definitely ask the professor whether this was allowable before doing it there.

-Dave K
 
  • #15
The advice in this thread has been very helpful! I have come a long way since then.

I have a mid-term next tuesday, and I am very confident on most of the material, but i would like to consolidate integration techniques. What would you recommend for me to do at this point? I have already lined up more practoce problems with available solutions.. but if there are any more ideas i would be glad to try something different.

Thanks guys, and this has been TOUGH but rewarding.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr. Courtney

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
26K