Calc I: Limits at Infinity: Solving r Irrational

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PFuser1232
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Limits
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 1K views
PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcI/LimitsAtInfinityI.aspx

According to the author, if ##c## is a real number and ##r## is a positive rational number then:
$$\lim_{x →\infty} \frac{c}{x^r} = 0$$
If ##x^r## is defined for ##x < 0## then:
$$\lim_{x →- \infty} \frac{c}{x^r} = 0$$
I understand why ##r## can't be irrational in case two. ##x^r## would not be defined.
However, I can't see why ##r## can't be irrational in case one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MohammedRady97 said:
However, I can't see why rr can't be irrational in case one.
Well, it can. Rewrite: [itex]\frac{c}{x^{r}}=\frac{c}{e^{r\ln(x)}}[/itex]. Then [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{c}{x^{r}}= \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{c}{e^{r\ln(x)}}= \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} e^{\ln (c)-r\ln(x)}[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phion
HallsofIvy said:
Saying "for r rational" does NOT say it is not also true for r irrational. It may or may not be in that case.

When is it not true for irrational ##r##?
 
You still do not understand. I am not saying statement is or is not true for any irrational r. I am simply pointing out that the initial statement "According to the author, if c c is a real number and r r is a positive rational number then:
[itex]\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{c}{x^r}= 0[/itex] does NOT say anything about what happens if r is irrational!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phion