Calc Mass of Earth for Hydrogen Atmos Retention

  • Thread starter Thread starter izzy93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planetary
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the mass required for Earth to retain a significant hydrogen atmosphere, maintaining its current density. The relevant equation involves the temperature limit for hydrogen retention, expressed as T < 5042 (Mp/Rp) * mn, where Mp is the mass ratio of the planet to Earth's mass, Rp is the radius ratio, and mn is the atomic mass number of hydrogen. Participants emphasize the need to clarify the equations provided, as they may not be accurate or useful for solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of planetary mass and radius ratios (Mp and Rp)
  • Familiarity with the atomic mass number (mn) of hydrogen
  • Knowledge of atmospheric retention principles
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of planetary mass on atmospheric retention
  • Study the relationship between temperature and gas retention in planetary atmospheres
  • Explore the concept of escape velocity in relation to atmospheric gases
  • Learn about the properties of hydrogen and its behavior in planetary atmospheres
USEFUL FOR

Students in planetary science, astrophysics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in atmospheric retention dynamics of celestial bodies.

izzy93
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


calculate approximately how much more massive the Earth would have to be before it could retain a significant hydrogen atmosphere, assuming the Earth’s density to be the same as its current value.

Homework Equations


Temperature limit to retain hydrogen in the Earth's atmosphere: T «< 5042 (Mp/Rp ) *mn
Mp= ratio of mass of planet/body to Earth’s RE
Rp = ratio of radius of planet/body to Earth’s
mn= atomic mass number of gas particle

The Attempt at a Solution


not sure how to begin , any tips much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
izzy93 said:
not sure how to begin
Reread the question for starters --- what's showing in "relevant equations" does NOT look terribly correct/useful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K