Undergrad Calc QED Charge Particle Repulsion/Attraction

Click For Summary
Feynman diagrams serve as a practical tool for performing perturbative calculations in quantum electrodynamics (QED), allowing the derivation of transition-matrix elements (S-matrix elements) essential for calculating scattering cross sections. To accurately assess particle interactions, calculations should be conducted at least to second order, as leading order results do not differentiate between repulsion and attraction. A suggested starting point for beginners is the e+e- to mu+mu- scattering process. For deeper understanding, consulting a textbook on quantum field theory, such as M. D. Schwartz's work, is recommended. Mastery of these concepts is crucial for effective QED calculations.
ILoveParticlePhysics
Messages
9
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
What is the formula for calculating the repulsion/attraction of charged particles in quantum electrodynamics?
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You just draw the Feynman diagram and calculute it according to the rules derived from the formalism. Feynman diagrams are just an ingenious shortcut to do these perturbative calculations. What you get are transition-matrix elements (S-matrix elements) from which you can calculate cross sections of scattering processes.
 
Note that you will need to calculate this to at least second order, because at leading order the scattering is the same either way.
 
vanhees71 said:
You just draw the Feynman diagram and calculute it according to the rules derived from the formalism. Feynman diagrams are just an ingenious shortcut to do these perturbative calculations. What you get are transition-matrix elements (S-matrix elements) from which you can calculate cross sections of scattering processes.
So, I calculate and draw the Feynman diagram, from which I get the S matrix elements from which I get the cross section of scattering processes which tells me how everything is going to repel/attract, right?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Vanadium 50 said:
Note that you will need to calculate this to at least second order, because at leading order the scattering is the same either way.
This might sound dumb, but what exactly is 2nd order.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
That looks like a good summary, but of course to really understand it, you should refer to some textbook on quantum field theory, e.g.,

M. D. Schwartz, Quantum field theory and the Standard
Model, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York
(2014).
 
  • Like
Likes ILoveParticlePhysics
ILoveParticlePhysics said:
This might sound dumb, but what exactly is 2nd order.

Um, you haven't done any QED calculations, have you? It would be better for you to fill in your background than having me define words you don't understand with other words you don't understand. The easiest calculation is probably e+e- --> mu+mu-. I'd start there.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K