Calc Radius of Curvature & Center P(h,k) + Improper Integrals

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hawaiidude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Radius
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of curvature and the center of a circle with respect to a curve, as well as the concept of improper integrals. Participants explore the mathematical formulations and reasoning behind these concepts, including the use of derivatives and limits.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the calculation of the radius of curvature and the center of a circle related to a curve, expressing uncertainty about improper integrals.
  • Another participant provides a formula for the radius of curvature involving first and second derivatives.
  • A different participant illustrates an example of an improper integral and its evaluation using limits.
  • Concerns are raised about the necessity of the second derivative in the radius of curvature formula, with one participant suggesting that the first derivative might suffice.
  • Another participant questions the reasoning behind raising the square root term to the power of three in the curvature formula.
  • A participant presents their own method for finding the radius of curvature, involving tangent slopes and arc length calculations, and seeks feedback on potential mistakes.
  • There is a discussion about the formula for arc length, with one participant challenging the steps taken by another and suggesting a standard formula for differential arc length.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the use of the distance formula between two points on a curve and the implications of taking limits as the distance approaches zero.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the insights gained during the discussion, indicating a better understanding of the radius of curvature concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of the second derivative for calculating the radius of curvature and the correct formulation of arc length. The discussion includes multiple competing approaches and remains unresolved on certain technical points.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' calculations and assumptions about limits and derivatives are not fully aligned, leading to confusion about the correct application of formulas. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding regarding the mathematical principles involved.

hawaiidude
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
how do you calculate the radius of curvature and the center p(h,k) of the circle with respect to the curve and how do you do improper integrals? kinda forgot improper integrals.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
R = \frac{[1 + (\frac{dy}{dx})^2]^\frac{3}{2}}{\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}} = \frac{[1 + f'(x)^2]^\frac{3}{2}}{f''(x)}
 
Do you mean like this?

\int _1 ^\infty \frac{1}{x^2}dx = \lim _{t \rightarrow \infty} \int _1 ^t \frac{1}{x^2}dx = \lim _{t \rightarrow \infty} 1 - \frac{1}{t} = 1
 
yes...i was just wondering for the radius of curvature, why is it the sercond derivative? i can compute the curvature but i walsy wondered why the second derivatie, after all, i believe a book said the first was acceptable..
 
That's not the part that concerns me, I don't understand why the square root of 1 + f'(x)^2 is raised to the power of three.

I tried to find the radius myself. It is given by:
R = \frac{\mbox{arc}}{\theta}

I found \theta using the slopes of the tangent lines. The angle between them is given by the formula:
\tan \theta = \lim_{dx \rightarrow 0}\frac{m_1 - m_2}{1 + m_1m_2}
And since \theta is very small you can say that \tan \theta = \sin \theta = \theta:

\theta = \lim_{dx \rightarrow 0}\frac{f'(x_1) - f'(x_2)}{1 + f'(x)^2}

To find the arc length I just used the normal d = \sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2} formula:
\mbox{arc} = \lim_{dx \rightarrow 0}\sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (f(x_2) - f(x_1))^2} =
\mbox{arc} = \lim_{dx \rightarrow 0}f(x_2) - f(x_1)

From this R is:

R = \lim_{dx \rightarrow 0}\frac{1 + f'(x)^2}{\frac{f'(x_1) - f'(x_2)}{f(x_2) - f(x_1)}} = \frac{1 + f'(x)^2}{f''(x)}

So where's my mistake?
 
Here's a little drawing that might help you understand what I did... still want to know where my mistake is.
 

Attachments

  • arcs.gif
    arcs.gif
    8.4 KB · Views: 610
Originally posted by Chen
Here's a little drawing that might help you understand what I did... still want to know where my mistake is.

maybe here?

Originally posted by Chen

To find the arc length I just used the normal d = \sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2} formula:
\mbox{arc} = \lim_{dx \rightarrow 0}\sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (f(x_2) - f(x_1))^2} =
\mbox{arc} = \lim_{dx \rightarrow 0}f(x_2) - f(x_1)

i don't follow that last step, but that is not the normal formula for ds that i know. it should look like:

<br /> ds=\sqrt{1+(f&#039;)^2}dx
 
Originally posted by lethe
i don't follow that last step, but that is not the normal formula for ds that i know. it should look like:

<br /> ds=\sqrt{1+(f&#039;)^2}dx
Well, I just used the formula of distance between two points. I took two points on the graph [x_1, f(x_1)] and [x_2, f(x_2)] with x_2 - x_1 tending to zero... how is that wrong, and how do you get to the formula you posted? :smile:
 
Originally posted by Chen
Well, I just used the formula of distance between two points. I took two points on the graph [x_1, f(x_1)] and [x_2, f(x_2)] with x_2 - x_1 tending to zero... how is that wrong
yeah, dx tends to zero, but so does f(x2)-f(x1), so to zeroth order, ds is just zero. you can't lose one term but keep the other.

but in calculus, we are not interested in zeroth order approximations, we are interested in first order approximations.

and how do you get to the formula you posted? :smile:
multiply and divide the whole thing by x2-x1. do your division inside the radical (which means you are actually dividing by (x2-x1)^2) and your multiplication outside the radical
 
  • #10
Ah-ha! I see now how to get the correct formula for the curvature. Thank you very much.
 
  • #11
thank you all always a great help! now i think i understand the concept of radius of curvature proving
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K