Calculate Area of an Oval - Tips & Ideas

  • Thread starter Thread starter ladil123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the area of an oval shape with known dimensions L, W, h, and b, the formula for an ellipse, pi*h*L/4, may not yield accurate results, especially when h varies significantly. A suggested approach is to calculate the rectangular area as L*h and the elliptical area separately using Pi*(h/2)*b, then combine these areas. However, there remains an unaccounted portion between the end of b and the rectangle's start that needs further clarification. The precise shape of the boundary is crucial for accurate calculations, as the current understanding of the shape is unclear. A detailed description or diagram of the boundary is necessary for a more accurate solution.
ladil123
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
area of an "oval"

Hello

I want to calculate the area under the length "L" of this shape.
W, h and b are known.

I am using the formula for a ellipse, pi*h*L/4 but it is not so good when h gets bigger for instance or when b gets smaller.
When h is small, the calculated area with the elipse equation gets to big, and when h gets larger the calculated area get smaller than it really is..


Any ideas or tips ?
 

Attachments

  • oval.gif
    oval.gif
    1.4 KB · Views: 551
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Calculate the rectangular and curved parts separately. The rectangular part's area is Lh. The shape of the curved parts has to be described in better detail.
 


you can try with the way mathman said. find out rectangle area by Lh, ellipse area (Pi*(h/2)*b) add both.
 


There will still be the left over part between where B ends and the rectangle starts.

Tough question. I am interested to hear a solution!
 


Miney said:
There will still be the left over part between where B ends and the rectangle starts.

Tough question. I am interested to hear a solution!

You need to be precise as to shape of the boundary! I cannot tell from the picture the exact shape of the part outside the rectangle.
 


even i don't understand the picture. i gave formula just assuming that b starts from the L that is L+2b = W.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top