MHB Calculate Definite Integral of arcos(tanx) from -pi/4 to pi/4

AI Thread Summary
The definite integral of arccos(tan(x)) from -π/4 to π/4 can be computed using a substitution method. By letting w = tan(x), the integral transforms into I = ∫ from -1 to 1 of arccos(w)/(w² + 1) dw. Integration by parts is applied, leading to the evaluation of boundary terms and the recognition that the remaining integral is odd, resulting in a value of zero. Consequently, the final result for the integral is I = (π/2)², approximately 2.4674. This method highlights a clever approach to handling complex integrals.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculate this definite integral?


Definite integral of arcos(tanx) dx from -pi/4 to pi/4
I know this isn't an easy antiderivative but my professor said there was a easy trick to compute this nonetheless.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Jeremy,

We are given to evaluate:

$$I=\int_{-\frac{\pi}{4}}^{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cos^{-1}\left(\tan(x) \right)\,dx$$

Consider the following substitution:

$$w=\tan(x)\,\therefore\,dw=\sec^2(x)\,dx$$

But, if we square the substitution and apply a Pythagorean identity, we find:

$$w^2=\tan^2(x)=\sec^2(x)-1\implies \sec^2(x)=w^2+1$$

And so we may state:

$$dx=\frac{1}{w^2+1}\,dw$$

And so our definite integral becomes:

$$I=\int_{-1}^{1} \frac{\cos^{-1}(w)}{w^2+1}\,dw$$

Applying integration by parts, let:

$$u=\cos^{-1}(w)\,\therefore\,du=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-w^2}}\,dw$$

$$dv=\frac{1}{w^2+1}\,dw\,\therefore\,v=\tan^{-1}(w)$$

Hence, we may state:

$$I=\left[\cos^{-1}(w)\tan^{-1}(w) \right]_{-1}^{1}+\int_{-1}^{1} \frac{\tan^{-1}(w)}{\sqrt{1-w^2}}\,dw$$

Now, observing that the remaining integrand is odd and the limits symmetric, we know it's value is zero, and so we are left with:

$$I=0\cdot\frac{\pi}{4}-\pi\left(-\frac{\pi}{4} \right)=\left(\frac{\pi}{2} \right)^2\approx2.46740110027234$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top