MHB Calculate Equilibrium Constant of 2BrCl <=> Br2 + Cl2

AI Thread Summary
The equilibrium constant for the reaction 2BrCl <=> Br2 + Cl2 is calculated using the concentrations at equilibrium. After heating 0.9 moles of BrCl in a 5-liter vessel, 0.4 moles of Cl2 and 0.4 moles of Br2 are produced, leaving 0.1 moles of BrCl. The correct formula for the equilibrium constant is Kc = (0.4 * 0.4) / (0.1^2), resulting in Kc = 16. It is noted that the volume cancels out in the calculation, making it unnecessary to know the exact volume when determining the equilibrium constant. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurately calculating Kc in similar reactions.
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
bromine monochloride dissociated on heating the following equation

2BrCl <=> Br2 + Cl2

.9 moles of BrCl were heated in a 5 liter vessel until equilibrium was established . the amount of free chlorine in the mixture was found to be .4 moles

calculate the equilibrium constant for the reaction.

i thought this would be the answer kc=(.4*.4)/(.8)^2

if there are .4 moles of cl2 there must be .4 moles of Br2

there are 2 moles of 2BrCl for every mole of cl2 so there must be .8 mole of BrCl

sadly this does not give the right answer which is kc=16
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
if there are .4 moles of cl2 there must be .4 moles of Br2

there are 2 moles of 2BrCl for every mole of cl2 so there must be .8 mole of BrCl

Careful here.

We are indeed dealing with 0.8 moles of $\ce{BrCl}$.
But those 0.8 moles of $\ce{BrCl}$ were dissociated in the reaction $\ce{2BrCl <=> Br2 + Cl2}$.
It means that from the original 0.9 moles, there are 0.1 moles left.
So in equilibrium we have 0.1 moles of $\ce{BrCl}$, 0.4 moles of $\ce{Br2}$, and 0.4 moles of $\ce{Cl2}$.

That makes the equilibrium constant:
$$K_c = \frac{0.4\cdot 0.4}{0.1^2} = 16$$
 
thanks.

isnt the concentration always supposed to be in moles per liter so should we divide by 5 as its in a 5 litre vessel. the answer at the back of the book is 16 though.

the next part of the question is explain why it is not necessary to know the volume of the solution when calculating the equilibrium constant.

i am not sure what i should say.
 
markosheehan said:
thanks.

isnt the concentration always supposed to be in moles per liter so should we divide by 5 as its in a 5 litre vessel. the answer at the back of the book is 16 though.

the next part of the question is explain why it is not necessary to know the volume of the solution when calculating the equilibrium constant.

i am not sure what i should say.

The divisions by the volume cancel in this case, because we have the same number of molecules on both sides of the equation.
With concentrations in mole per liter the equilibrium constant is:
$$K_c = \frac{\frac{0.4\text{ mol}}{\cancel{5\text{ L}}}\cdot \frac{0.4\text{ mol}}{\cancel{5\text{ L}}}}
{\left(\frac{0.1\text{ mol}}{\cancel{5\text{ L}}}\right)^2} = 16$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top