MHB Calculate Equilibrium Constant of 2BrCl <=> Br2 + Cl2

markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
bromine monochloride dissociated on heating the following equation

2BrCl <=> Br2 + Cl2

.9 moles of BrCl were heated in a 5 liter vessel until equilibrium was established . the amount of free chlorine in the mixture was found to be .4 moles

calculate the equilibrium constant for the reaction.

i thought this would be the answer kc=(.4*.4)/(.8)^2

if there are .4 moles of cl2 there must be .4 moles of Br2

there are 2 moles of 2BrCl for every mole of cl2 so there must be .8 mole of BrCl

sadly this does not give the right answer which is kc=16
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
if there are .4 moles of cl2 there must be .4 moles of Br2

there are 2 moles of 2BrCl for every mole of cl2 so there must be .8 mole of BrCl

Careful here.

We are indeed dealing with 0.8 moles of $\ce{BrCl}$.
But those 0.8 moles of $\ce{BrCl}$ were dissociated in the reaction $\ce{2BrCl <=> Br2 + Cl2}$.
It means that from the original 0.9 moles, there are 0.1 moles left.
So in equilibrium we have 0.1 moles of $\ce{BrCl}$, 0.4 moles of $\ce{Br2}$, and 0.4 moles of $\ce{Cl2}$.

That makes the equilibrium constant:
$$K_c = \frac{0.4\cdot 0.4}{0.1^2} = 16$$
 
thanks.

isnt the concentration always supposed to be in moles per liter so should we divide by 5 as its in a 5 litre vessel. the answer at the back of the book is 16 though.

the next part of the question is explain why it is not necessary to know the volume of the solution when calculating the equilibrium constant.

i am not sure what i should say.
 
markosheehan said:
thanks.

isnt the concentration always supposed to be in moles per liter so should we divide by 5 as its in a 5 litre vessel. the answer at the back of the book is 16 though.

the next part of the question is explain why it is not necessary to know the volume of the solution when calculating the equilibrium constant.

i am not sure what i should say.

The divisions by the volume cancel in this case, because we have the same number of molecules on both sides of the equation.
With concentrations in mole per liter the equilibrium constant is:
$$K_c = \frac{\frac{0.4\text{ mol}}{\cancel{5\text{ L}}}\cdot \frac{0.4\text{ mol}}{\cancel{5\text{ L}}}}
{\left(\frac{0.1\text{ mol}}{\cancel{5\text{ L}}}\right)^2} = 16$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top