Calculate frank's distance and displacement.

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Displacement
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Frank's journey involves driving 14 km east, 6 km north, 12 km at 15° north of east, and 2 km at 65° east of north, totaling a distance of 34 km. The displacement is calculated using vector components, resulting in a total displacement of 26.4 km at an angle of 44.23° north of east. Average speed is determined using the formula vav = Δd/Δt, yielding an average speed of 48 km/h over the 42-minute trip. Average velocity is represented as a vector, confirming the directional aspect of Frank's movement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector components in physics
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions (sine, cosine)
  • Knowledge of the Pythagorean theorem
  • Ability to apply the cosine and sine laws for non-right triangles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector addition and subtraction in physics
  • Learn about the cosine and sine laws in triangle calculations
  • Explore the concept of average speed versus average velocity
  • Practice problems involving displacement and distance in two-dimensional motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics, as well as educators looking for practical examples of vector analysis in motion problems.

STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



Frank drives a load of tomatoes 14 km [E], 6 km [N], 12 km [N 15° E] ( East 15 degrees of north ) and then 2 km [N 65° E]. The trip takes 42 minutes.

a) Calculate frank's distance and displacement.
b) Calculate frank's average speed and average velocity.

Homework Equations



##Δt = 42m##

##v_{av} = \frac{Δd}{Δt}## - ave speed

##\vec{v_{av}}= \frac{\vec{Δd}}{Δt}## - ave velocity

The Attempt at a Solution



a) So the first thing I did was drew a diagram of what was going on.

Now to calculate the distance ##Δd## which is pretty straightforward, consider :

##Δd = d_1 + d_2 + d_3 + d_4 = 34 km##

Now calculating the displacement ##\vec{Δd}## is a bit trickier. Looking at my diagram, I notice the first two distances allow me to form a right angle triangle with which to calculate the displacement from the origin to the end of the second distance.

Then I think I can make another triangle from my second distance to the end of my fourth distance and calculate the displacement that way.

After that question b) really isn't an issue. I just want to make sure my approach to the displacement is correct before I continue.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about distance 3?
 
Yes, that will work. After that form a triangle using the displacement from distance 1 + distance 2, and distance 3 + distance 4 as 2 of the sides.
 
I think the simplest way to do this is to use vector components. "14km [E]" is <14, 0>. "6 km [N]" is <0, 6>, "12 km [N 15° E] ( East 15 degrees of north )" is <12 sin(15), 12 cos(15)>, "2 km [N 65° E]" is <2 sin(65), 2 cos(64)> and add "component wise"- the displacement vector is given by <14+ 0+ 12 sin(15)+ 2 sin(65), 0+ 6+ 12 cos(15)+ 2 cos(65)>.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I think the simplest way to do this is to use vector components. "14km [E]" is <14, 0>. "6 km [N]" is <0, 6>, "12 km [N 15° E] ( East 15 degrees of north )" is <12 sin(15), 12 cos(15)>, "2 km [N 65° E]" is <2 sin(65), 2 cos(64)> and add "component wise"- the displacement vector is given by <14+ 0+ 12 sin(15)+ 2 sin(65), 0+ 6+ 12 cos(15)+ 2 cos(65)>.

I'm going to remember this for sure, but the thing is I'm not allowed to use this methodology to get the answer while it does look 100x more convenient.

Okay so I formed my first triangle which is right angled. I used the pyth theorem to obtain ##c = 15.23 km##

Then I found my angle ##θ## between ##d_1## and ##d_2## to be ##23.2°##.

Therefore the displacement from ##d_1## to ##d_2## is ##\vec{Δd_1} = 15.23 km [E 23.2° N]##.

Now I have one of the two displacements I need. So I formed the second triangle which is not a right angled triangle and I need to calculate the displacement from the start of ##d_3## to the end of ##d_4##.

Using the cosine law and then the sine law should work here.

##c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2abcos(C)##
##c^2 = (12)^2 + (2)^2 - 2(12)(2)cos(?)##

I'm having a bit of trouble calculating the angle between ##d_3## and ##d_4## without using dot products or advanced theorems. That should give me c. Then I simply use the sine law to calculate my angle ##\phi## for the direction.
 
Remember that ## \vec{a} + \vec{b} = \vec{b} + \vec{a} ##. In your case that means you can sum all but the third displacement, which is easy, and then add the third displacement, so you only need to deal with angles once.
 
voko said:
Remember that ## \vec{a} + \vec{b} = \vec{b} + \vec{a} ##. In your case that means you can sum all but the third displacement, which is easy, and then add the third displacement, so you only need to deal with angles once.

This confused me a bit. Why am I adding vectors with different directions together if I'm finding displacement?

I don't seem to see why I only need to deal with angles once when there are two triangles to consider?

EDIT : I'm getting the angle C to be 100 degrees though I'm not positive about this.
 
Last edited:
Zondrina said:
This confused me a bit. Why am I adding vectors with different directions together if I'm finding displacement?
Because that's what displacement is- the sum of the individual vector displacements.

I don't seem to see why I only need to deal with angles once when there are two triangles to consider?
You don't. You need to deal with the angles as long as you have "triangles" at all!

EDIT : I'm getting the angle C to be 100 degrees though I'm not positive about this.
 
Zondrina said:
I don't seem to see why I only need to deal with angles once when there are two triangles to consider?

All the other displacements are at right angles to one another, dealing with them is trivial.
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
Because that's what displacement is- the sum of the individual vector displacements.


You don't. You need to deal with the angles as long as you have "triangles" at all!

Alright, perhaps using the triangles isn't a good idea without a scale model. From what I'm hearing in this thread I might as well break the vectors into their respective components and figure the displacement out that way.

Let ##\vec{Δd_E}## denote the total displacement east in km and ##\vec{Δd_N}## denote the total displacement north in km.

Since ##d_1 = 14km [E]## we have##\vec{Δd_E} = 14##.

Now ##d_2 = 6km [N]## so ##\vec{Δd_N} = 6##.

##d_3 = 12km [N 15° E]## so we need to break this vector into it's N and E components. We will have displacement 12sin(15°) [E] and 12cos(15°) [N]. Add those onto our total displacement vectors.

Same deal for ##d_4## so after computing everything, I get ##\vec{Δd} = 26.4 km##

Now I need to figure out the direction of ##\vec{Δd}## if I'm not mistaken. Using ##tanθ = o/a## I get ##θ = 44.23°##.

Therefore ##\vec{Δd} = 26.4 km [E 44.23° N]##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
21K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K