Calculate Mass Speed at .05m Displacement: .4 kg, 80 N/m

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dark Visitor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Speed
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass of 0.4 kg attached to a spring with a spring constant of 80 N/m, undergoing simple harmonic motion. The specific question is to determine the speed of the mass at a displacement of 0.05 m from its equilibrium position, given that it starts at a displacement of 0.10 m.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy to relate potential and kinetic energy in the system. There are inquiries about how to apply the relevant equations and where to place specific values.

Discussion Status

Several participants are working through the equations and checking their calculations. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the application of energy conservation and the values to use. Some participants have identified errors in their calculations and are revisiting their work.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under a deadline for homework submission and are seeking clarity on the correct application of physics principles without explicit guidance on the final answer.

Dark Visitor
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
A mass of .4 kg, hanging from a spring with a constant of 80 N/m, is set into an up-and-down simple harmonic motion. What is the speed of the mass when moving through a point at .05 m displacement? The starting displacement of the mass is .10 m from its equilibrium position.

* zero
* 1.4 m/s
* 1.7 m/s
* 1.2 m/s



I am confused with this one. I don't know where to begin. Any help would be appreciated. I need to have this done by Monday. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried the conservation of energy?
 
How do I do that? I mean I know what it is, but what numbers go where?
 
This is a bit like the pendulum problem we just did. The relevant eqns are F=-ky where k is the force constant of the spring (given) Also, if we are to take ideasrule tip, we know that the energy (potential) stored in the spring is 1/2ky^2.

When the spring-mass is set into motion some of the potential energy in the spring will be converted to kinetic energy but the sum is always the same, ie

1/2mv^2+1/2ky(t)^2=1/2k(y')^2 where y(t) is the location as a function of time and relative to the equilibrium position and y' is the equilibrium position with the mass. I believe this approach allows us to ignore the potential energy from gravity. Try it and let me know. In this case, y'=0.1 and y(t)=0.05
 
I see what you're saying, but how do I find k for all of the equations? I know I probably have to use F = -ky, but how do I use it?
 
Dark Visitor said:
I see what you're saying, but how do I find k for all of the equations? I know I probably have to use F = -ky, but how do I use it?


The K is given. This is the 80N/m. Using energy conservation, you should not have to use F=-ky. Sorry if I misled you, I didn't realize that K was given and thought we had to solve for it using that.
 
Just to make sure I am doing this right, I am using the equation you gave me before to find v?
 
Dark Visitor said:
Just to make sure I am doing this right, I am using the equation you gave me before to find v?
yes, the one that has elements of potential and kinetic energy.
 
Okay, I finally got .38729 as my velocity.
 
  • #10
show some work, I'll check in the meantime.
 
  • #11
Okay, try your best to follow along. It's hard to type something like this:

v = \sqrt{}(1/2(80 N/m)(.1 m)<sup>2</sup> - 1/2(80 N/m)(.05 m)<sup>2</sup>)/ 1/2(4 kg)

Which I got:

v = \sqrt{}(.4 - .1)/2)

which led me to that answer. (SUP means exponent, so (SUP 2 SUP) means squared. It messed that up for some reason.
 
  • #12
Hmmm, I get a different answer than given as well, but it is 3.87m/s. Let me think about this for a minute, I'm wondering if he is giving the equilibrium of the spring w/o the mass.
 
  • #13
Well i did the math again, and got 1/2mv^2=1/2 k(0.01-0.0025)/m

v^2=80(0.0075)/.4=1.5 so I'm sticking with 1.2 for the answer. But no guarantees.
 
  • #14
But 1.5 wasn't an answer. Are we going to stick with 1.2? And why 1.2?
 
  • #15
So should I just say 1.2? And how do I show how I arrived at that answer?
 
  • #16
Dark Visitor said:
So should I just say 1.2? And how do I show how I arrived at that answer?
1.5 was v^2 so v=1.22 Your work was fine, just recheck the math.
 
  • #17
Yes! I found my mistake. And you were right. Thanks a lot.
 
  • #18
Yes! You were right, and I checked it and found my error. Thank you! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
873
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K