Calculate Pressure of Interstellar Hydrogen Gas at 3K

  • Thread starter Thread starter hasan_researc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Ideal gas
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the pressure of interstellar hydrogen gas at a temperature of 3 K, with a specified density of 1 particle per cm³. The original poster attempts to apply the ideal gas law to determine the pressure exerted by these particles, questioning the implications of the gas not being contained within a physical boundary.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the interpretation of pressure in the context of an uncontained gas, questioning whether an imaginary surface can be used to conceptualize pressure. There are discussions about the derivation of the pressure formula and its applicability in free space.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of pressure and its derivation from kinetic theory. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of pressure in relation to imaginary surfaces, but no consensus has been reached on the implications of the gas being uncontained.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the assumptions underlying the ideal gas law and its application to interstellar conditions, including the lack of a physical container and the role of gravity in maintaining the gas's structure.

hasan_researc
Messages
166
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Some regions of interstellar space is made of lone hydrogen atoms with a density of 1 particle / cm3, at a temperature of around 3 K. Calculate the pressure due to these particles.

Homework Equations



P = nkbT, where P is the pressure, n is the number density and T is the temp.

The Attempt at a Solution



n = 10-6
T = 3
So, P = 4.14 X 10-29 Pa.

The gas is not contained in a container, so are we assuming an imaginary surface within which lies a certain quantity of hydrogen atoms and then calculating the pressure exerted on that imaginary surface by the atoms? This interpretation seems to make sense to me because the volume of the surface is independent of the pressure, as seen from the original equation.

What does everyone think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Our sun is mainly hydrogen. But, the gas in not enclosed by a container. Gravity keeps the gas together. This is true with the gas planets, other stars, ...
 
But in order for pressure to have physical meaning, should the gas be not imagined to exist in a container, be it real or imaginary?
 
The formula for the pressure of ideal gases was derived by assuming the gas confined in a container. The molecules are in random motion, collide to the wall and transfer momentum to it. During two subsequent collisions, there is an average force on the wall, and so on. At the end you get a formula that the pressure is proportional to the average translational kinetic energy of the particles and their number density. Using the Equipartition Principle, the average translational kinetic energy of a particle is 3/2 kbT and you get the relation in the form

P=nkbT

where n is the number density. This equation does not contain the volume, so you can apply it even in free space. This pressure would be experienced with any wall placed into the gas. There is no difference if you place an imaginary container or a simple wall: the wall experiences the pressure given by the formula. The molecules are in random motion, as they collide not only with the walls of a container, but with each other, too. The number of the molecules arriving at a single wall is the same either in the presence of other walls confining a big enough closed volume or without them.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
965
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K