Calculate Skier's Horizontal Distance on Frictionless Incline: Energy Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter parwana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Major
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a skier starting from rest at the top of a frictionless incline with a height of 20.0 m, transitioning to a horizontal surface with kinetic friction. The goal is to determine the horizontal distance traveled before the skier comes to rest, considering the effects of friction on both the incline and the horizontal surface.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of energy conservation equations and the role of mass in the calculations. There are attempts to express the problem symbolically and concerns about the treatment of mass in the equations. Some participants question the clarity of the problem statement regarding friction on the incline.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the problem with various approaches being discussed. Some participants have provided guidance on simplifying equations by canceling mass, while others express confusion about the method and the problem's conditions. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in the problem statement regarding whether the incline is frictionless or has friction, which may affect the setup of the equations. There is also a mention of calculating the length of the incline rather than the height, which could lead to further confusion.

parwana
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
5-19.gif


Problem A skier starts from rest at the top of a frictionless incline of height 20.0 m, as in Figure 5.19. As the bottom of the incline, the skier encounters a horizontal surface where the coefficient of kinetic friction between skis and snow is 0.225.

Find the horizontal distance the skier travels before coming to rest if the incline also has a coefficient of kinetic friction equal to 0.225.

I tried setting it up like this. I found the height(y) of the incline by doing 20/sin20= 58.476

-0.225mgcos20(58.476)- 0.225mgd= 0-mgy

Now I don't know what to do, help. How do I get rid of the m's, cause there are 3 this time. Am I doing something wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All of the terms in your equation have an m in them. Just divide it out.
 
I can't get it right, please tell me if I am doing something wrong. And how do I divide the m's out, there are 3 of them.
 
can someone help me please
 
First off they give you the height in the diagram to be 20.0 m. Second off, solving this problem in symbols first makes it much easier.

\Delta KE = \Delta U_g
\frac {1} {2} mv_f^2-\frac {1} {2}mv_i^2 = mgy_i - mgy_f
the initial kinetic is 0, the final gravitational potential energy is 0.
\frac {1} {2} mv_f^2 = mgy_i
you can cancel the masses by dividing both sides by m...
v_f= \sqrt{2gy_i}

You got the final velocity at the bottom of the hill. From there you calculate the acceleration he has from friction. Then it is a simple motion problem.
 
Bishopuser I don't understand that method

Here is how I attempted it

for the coefficient of friction I will use the symbol (uk) ok and for the height/distance of the incline as D okok so in symbolic format, this is how I know how to do it

-ukND-ukmgd= 0 + mgy1

I found the height(y) of the incline by doing 20/sin20= 58.476
N= normal force= mgcos20

so its

-uk(mgcos20)58.476-ukmgd= mgy1

Is this right so far? Now I have trouble with the masses and I am confused what to do here.
 
look at your first equation this way:
m[-0.225gcos20(58.476)- 0.225gd]= mgy
now does dividing the mass out make sense?

You may need a brush-up on your algebra skills a bit.
 
Is the incline frictionless or with friction? The problem reads both ways. Also, you have calculated the length of ther incline, not the height of the incline. The height is given as y = 20.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K