Calculate Temperature of 1 Solar Mass Black Hole

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crush1986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackhole
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the temperature of a one solar mass black hole using the entropy equation S = (8π²GM²k)/(hc) and the relationship E = Mc². A participant initially misapplied the partial derivative with respect to internal energy (U), leading to an incorrect temperature calculation of 6.14 * 10^-8 K. The correct approach involves recognizing the need to factor in the relationship between mass (M) and internal energy (U) through the chain rule, specifically using the derivative ∂M/∂U to achieve accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic entropy and its equations
  • Familiarity with Einstein's mass-energy equivalence (E = Mc²)
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their application in thermodynamics
  • Proficiency in applying the chain rule in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in thermodynamic equations
  • Explore advanced concepts in black hole thermodynamics
  • Learn about the implications of Hawking radiation on black hole temperature
  • Investigate the relationship between entropy and temperature in various physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics, black hole physics, and advanced calculus applications.

Crush1986
Messages
205
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement



The problem is to calculate the temperature of a one solar mass black hole

Homework Equations



S = \frac{8\pi^2GM^2k}{hc}
E = Mc^2
\frac{1}{T} = \frac{\partial S}{\partial U}

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
My first solution I pulled out an Mc^2 Which left my equation looking like S = \frac{k8\pi^2GM} {hc}*U and did the partial derivative with respect to U of the entropy equation. I found that I was off by a factor of two (I think, I don't for sure know the right answer but some friends got answers 1/2 as much as my answer).

I think I know why and I just want to check out my reasoning. By only factoring out one U instead of U^2 I left an M in the equation. But M and U are intricately related right? So I must take out a U^2 in order to take out all of the M's in the original equation. It is only then that I get the correct result (That being 6.14 *10^-8 K, which I believe to be right but I'm also not entirely sure.)

Does this sound like a reasonable conclusion as to why I'm probably wrong?

Thank you for any help you can offer!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot that through ##E=Mc^2## you have to use that ##\frac{\partial M}{\partial U}## also contributes to the derivative.
Then you get the right result.

Another approach you can use is using the chain rule.
Then you can write ##\frac{1}{T} = \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} = \frac{\partial S}{\partial M}\frac{\partial M}{\partial U}##.
Usually I would go for this.
In this case the relation between E and M is simple but for harder problems (in possibly other domains) the algebraic manipulations can get ugly real quick increasing the probabilities of mistakes.
 
JorisL said:
You forgot that through ##E=Mc^2## you have to use that ##\frac{\partial M}{\partial U}## also contributes to the derivative.
Then you get the right result.

Another approach you can use is using the chain rule.
Then you can write ##\frac{1}{T} = \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} = \frac{\partial S}{\partial M}\frac{\partial M}{\partial U}##.
Usually I would go for this.
In this case the relation between E and M is simple but for harder problems (in possibly other domains) the algebraic manipulations can get ugly real quick increasing the probabilities of mistakes.
This is so late I know, but, THANK YOU!

I didn't quite get it at the time... I mean I knew of the chain rule, I just never really recognized when to use it until JUST now.

I've been shredding through a lot of problems tonight remembering to keep this little mathematical tool in my pocket.
 
Crush1986 said:
This is so late I know, but, THANK YOU!

I didn't quite get it at the time... I mean I knew of the chain rule, I just never really recognized when to use it until JUST now.

I've been shredding through a lot of problems tonight remembering to keep this little mathematical tool in my pocket.

Your welcome. It's useful to look back at old problems whenever you learn something new.
This helps you selecting suitable tools further on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
857
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K