Calculate the charge in a hollow spherical conductor

Click For Summary
A hollow spherical conductor with a total charge of +5e has a charge of -3e placed at its center. The charge on the inner surface of the conductor is +3e, which balances the negative charge at the center, while the outer surface carries a charge of +2e to maintain the total charge of +5e. The discussion emphasizes the application of Gauss's Law to determine the charge distribution, highlighting that the electric field inside the conductor is zero. This leads to the conclusion that the enclosed charge must equal zero, reinforcing the relationship between the charges on the inner and outer surfaces. Understanding these principles clarifies the charge distribution in the hollow spherical conductor.
Renaldo
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Consider a hollow spherical conductor with total charge +5e. The outer and inner radii are a and b, respectively.

(a) Calculate the charge on the sphere's inner and outer surfaces if a charge of -3e is placed at the center of the sphere. (Use the following as necessary: e.)


Homework Equations



Gauss's Law?

The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly don't have much of a clue. I feel like the problem should be pretty simple, but I'm not grasping all the aspects of Gauss's Law.

I hypothesized that the charge was 0 on the inner surface, and surmised that the charge on the outer surface should be equal to the total charge. This was wrong. I then hypothesized that the inner charge would be -3e and that the outer charge would need to be added to this to result in 5e, so 8e. Also not correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Renaldo said:
I then hypothesized that the inner charge would be -3e
Close, but you made a small mistake. Think that through again.
 
The inner surface would be +3e because the positive charge would be attracted by the negative field, accumulating on the outside of the sphere. The charge on the outer surface would be +2e because the field is weaker there, and we know the total charge is +5e. Is this correct?
 
Renaldo said:
The inner surface would be +3e because the positive charge would be attracted by the negative field, accumulating on the outside of the sphere. The charge on the outer surface would be +2e because the field is weaker there, and we know the total charge is +5e. Is this correct?
Sounds right to me. But it also sounds as though you are basing this on a hunch rather than on known principles. Consider the field in the conductor, i.e. between the inner and outer surfaces. What do you know about that? How would you calculate it from the isolated charge in the cavity, the charge on the inner surface, and the charge on the outer surface?
 
All right, I will give it a shot.

q/εo = ∫Eda
q/εo = E4∏r2

E = kq/r2

Inner radius = b

E1 = kq1/b2

Outer radius = a

E2 = kq2/a2

E1+E2 = kq1/b2 + kq2/a2

E3 = E1+E2
E3 = kq3/r2

kq3/r2 = kq1/b2 + kq2/a2

This leaves me with three variables.
 
Renaldo said:
All right, I will give it a shot.

q/εo = ∫Eda
q/εo = E4∏r2

E = kq/r2

Inner radius = b

E1 = kq1/b2

Outer radius = a

E2 = kq2/a2

E1+E2 = kq1/b2 + kq2/a2

E3 = E1+E2
E3 = kq3/r2

kq3/r2 = kq1/b2 + kq2/a2

This leaves me with three variables.

The electric field inside of a conductor is zero, right? Pick a radius r where a<r<b. So it's inside of the conductor. Then use Gauss' law at radius r. What does that tell you?
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
The electric field inside of a conductor is zero, right? Pick a radius r where a<r<b. So it's inside of the conductor. Then use Gauss' law at radius r. What does that tell you?

Perhaps I am confused as to the nature of hollow spherical conductors. If I understand the problem correctly, a point where a<r<b would be inside the metal of the shell. What is the purpose of using Gauss's Law here? Would not the field at this point be = to 0?
 
Renaldo said:
Perhaps I am confused as to the nature of hollow spherical conductors. If I understand the problem correctly, a point where a<r<b would be inside the metal of the shell. What is the purpose of using Gauss's Law here? Would not the field at this point be = to 0?

Yes, it would. So the enclosed charge must be zero, yes?
 
Dick said:
Yes, it would. So the enclosed charge must be zero, yes?

(a) Calculate the charge on the sphere's inner and outer surfaces if a charge of -3e is placed at the center of the sphere.

So the enclosed charge is not equal to -3e? What does -3e represent?
 
  • #10
Renaldo said:
(a) Calculate the charge on the sphere's inner and outer surfaces if a charge of -3e is placed at the center of the sphere.

So the enclosed charge is not equal to -3e? What does -3e represent?

The enclosed charge is the sum of -3e plus the charge on the inner surface of the conductor. The Gauss integral is zero. Hence, what's the charge on the inner surface on the conductor? Help me out here.
 
  • #11
Dick said:
The enclosed charge is the sum of -3e plus the charge on the inner surface of the conductor. The Gauss integral is zero. Hence, what's the charge on the inner surface on the conductor? Help me out here.

Oh, I see. The enclosed charge is equal to the charge on the inner radius, b, plus the charge in the center. It's obviously 3e, since the field is equal to 0.

As for the outer radius, I know that the spherical conductor has total charge, +5e. In order for it to have this total charge, I add the charges on the two surfaces together:

3e + 2e = 5e

It's really quite simple, but I was failing to understand the logic behind it. Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K