Calculate the charge on an oil droplet

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the charge of an oil droplet, with one participant noting a discrepancy between their result of 6.67 x 10^-19C and the book's answer of 3.2 x 10^-19C. Participants agree that the book likely contains an error and emphasize the importance of including the negative sign for charge and rounding to two significant figures. They suggest using a systematic approach by combining formulas before performing calculations. Additionally, they recommend including units in intermediate steps and working with symbols for clarity. Overall, the conversation highlights common pitfalls in physics calculations and encourages best practices.
Shaye
Messages
20
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
A tiny negatively charged oil drop is held stationary in the electric field between two horizontal parallel plates, as shown below (please see attachment). Its mass is 4.0x10^-15kg.

Question 15,b) Use the fact that the 2 forces balance to calculate the charge on the oil drop. (g = 10 N Kg^-1).
Relevant Equations
1. F - Ma
2. E = F/Q or E = V/D (Electric field strength)
The book gives an answer of Q = 3.2 x 10^-19C

I get an answer of 6.67 x 10^-19C. Workings below:

20220417_110122.LARGE.jpeg
20220407_114835.LARGE.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shaye said:
The book gives an answer of Q = 3.2 x 10^-19C

I get an answer of 6.67 x 10^-19C.
Hi @Shaye. I agree with your calculation. Looks like a mistake in the book.

Other points:
- don’t forget the minus sign for the charge;
- round the answer to 2 significant figures;
- in your intermediate step, when you find the value of the force, it’s good practice to include the unit (N);
- consider working in symbols and leaving the arithmetic to the end.
 
  • Like
Likes Shaye and PeroK
Steve4Physics said:
- consider working in symbols and leaving the arithmetic to the end.
I agree. At this level, I would expect you to combine two simple formulas before plugging in the numbers:
$$mg = qE = \frac{qV}{d} \ \Rightarrow \ q = \frac{mgd}{V}$$Then you do that on a calculator.
 
  • Like
Likes Shaye and Steve4Physics
Steve4Physics said:
Hi @Shaye. I agree with your calculation. Looks like a mistake in the book.

Other points:
- don’t forget the minus sign for the charge;
- round the answer to 2 significant figures;
- in your intermediate step, when you find the value of the force, it’s good practice to include the unit (N);
- consider working in symbols and leaving the arithmetic to the end.
Thanks @Steve4Physics
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
PeroK said:
I agree. At this level, I would expect you to combine two simple formulas before plugging in the numbers:
$$mg = qE = \frac{qV}{d} \ \Rightarrow \ q = \frac{mgd}{V}$$Then you do that on a calculator.
Yeah I should probably start to do this going forward @PeroK Good tip!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K