Calculate the circumference/diameter in this relativistic problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativistic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the circumference in a relativistic context, specifically addressing the formula derived for the circumference \(C\) in a rotating reference frame. The initial calculation presented by the user, which involves integrating the proper time and results in \(C = 2\pi \sqrt{(1/w^2-r^2)}\), is identified as incorrect. The error lies in misunderstanding the relationship between proper time and the actual distance traveled by an observer at the edge of the rotating frame, as clarified by another participant in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with proper time and its calculation
  • Knowledge of rotating reference frames
  • Basic proficiency in calculus for integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of proper time in rotating frames in special relativity
  • Learn about the metric tensor in curved spacetime
  • Explore the concept of time dilation in rotating systems
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of circumference in non-inertial frames
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on relativity, as well as mathematicians interested in the applications of calculus in physical problems.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
> A record turntable of radius $R$ rotates at angular velocity $w$ (Fig.
> 12.15). The circumference is presumably Lorentz-contracted, but the radius (being perpendicular to the velocity) is not. What's the ratio
> of the circumference to the diameter, in terms of $w$ and $R$?
Relevant Equations
.
$$ds^2 = dt^2 - r^2 d\theta^2 = d\theta^2((dt/d\theta)^2-r^2) = d\theta^2((1/w)^2-r^2)$$ $$C = \Delta S = \int ds = \int \sqrt{(1/w^2-r^2)}d\theta = 2\pi \sqrt{(1/w^2-r^2)} $$ $$C/2r = \frac{\pi \sqrt{(1/w^2-r^2)}}{r} = \pi \sqrt{\frac{1}{(wr)^2}-1}$$

But this answer is wrong. And i don't know why. I can't see the problem on my reasoning. I have just calculated the distance at the rotating reference frame.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
I have just calculated the distance at the rotating reference frame.
No, you have not. You have computed the proper time taken for an observer situated at the edge to complete a full turn and divided it by ##2r##.
 
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
525
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
52
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K