Calculate the circumference/diameter in this relativistic problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativistic
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the circumference in a relativistic context using a specific equation for proper time in a rotating reference frame. The initial calculation attempts to derive the circumference but is deemed incorrect. The error is identified as misinterpreting the computation, which actually represents the proper time for an observer at the edge completing a full rotation, rather than the circumference itself. Clarification is provided that the relationship between proper time and circumference needs to be accurately understood in this relativistic scenario. The focus remains on resolving the misunderstanding of the calculations involved.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
> A record turntable of radius $R$ rotates at angular velocity $w$ (Fig.
> 12.15). The circumference is presumably Lorentz-contracted, but the radius (being perpendicular to the velocity) is not. What's the ratio
> of the circumference to the diameter, in terms of $w$ and $R$?
Relevant Equations
.
$$ds^2 = dt^2 - r^2 d\theta^2 = d\theta^2((dt/d\theta)^2-r^2) = d\theta^2((1/w)^2-r^2)$$ $$C = \Delta S = \int ds = \int \sqrt{(1/w^2-r^2)}d\theta = 2\pi \sqrt{(1/w^2-r^2)} $$ $$C/2r = \frac{\pi \sqrt{(1/w^2-r^2)}}{r} = \pi \sqrt{\frac{1}{(wr)^2}-1}$$

But this answer is wrong. And i don't know why. I can't see the problem on my reasoning. I have just calculated the distance at the rotating reference frame.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
I have just calculated the distance at the rotating reference frame.
No, you have not. You have computed the proper time taken for an observer situated at the edge to complete a full turn and divided it by ##2r##.
 
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
424
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
52
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K