Calculation of Electrostatic Potential Given a Volume Charge Density

In summary, the conversation discusses the difficulties in applying the equations for total charge and electric potential to a given charge distribution. The difficulty arises in evaluating the second integral, which requires splitting into two parts due to the limits of integration. The final part of the conversation discusses finding the divergence of the electric field and how it relates to the original charge density.
  • #1
cwill53
220
40
Homework Statement
This problem is a rehash of Problem 2.50 of the book Introduction to Electrodynamics by Griffiths.

A volume charge density of some configuration is
$$\rho (r)=\epsilon _0A\left [ 4\pi \delta ^3(\mathbf{r})-\frac{\lambda ^2}{r}e^{-\lambda r} \right ]$$

where ##A## and ##\lambda ## are positive constants, and ##r## is the distance from origin in spherical coordinates.
(a) Find the total charge of this configuration.
(b) Calculate the potential due to this ##\rho (r)## by using the expression for the potential
due to a continuous charge distribution.
(c) Calculate the electric field ##E## directly from the potential and verify that the
differential form of Gauss’s law is obeyed.
Relevant Equations
$$Q=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}^{}\rho \, d^3\mathbf{r}$$

$$V(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _0}\int_{\Gamma }^{}\frac{\rho (\mathbf{r'})}{\left \| \mathbf{r-r'} \right \|}d^3\mathbf{r'}$$

I know for sure that the desired potential is

$$V(\mathbf{r})=A\frac{e^{-\lambda r}}{r}$$
Part (a) was simple, after applying

$$Q=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}^{}\rho \, d^3\mathbf{r}$$

I found that the total charge of the configuration was zero.

Part (b) is where the difficulties arise for me. I applied

$$V(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _0}\int_{\Gamma }^{}\frac{\rho (\mathbf{r'})}{\left \| \mathbf{r-r'} \right \|}d^3\mathbf{r'}$$

to the given charge distribution. Here's my work.

$$V(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\epsilon _0A\left [ 4\pi \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}^{}\frac{\delta ^3(\mathbf{r})}{\left \| \mathbf{r-r'} \right \|}d^3\mathbf{r}-\int_{0}^{2\pi }d\phi \int_{0}^{\pi }\sin\theta d\theta \int_{0}^{\infty }\frac{\lambda ^2e^{-\lambda r'}}{r'\left \| \mathbf{r-r'} \right \|}r'^2dr' \right ]$$

$$\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}^{}\frac{\delta ^3(\mathbf{r})}{\left \| \mathbf{r-r'} \right \|}d^3\mathbf{r}=\frac{1}{\left \| \mathbf{r} \right \|}=\frac{1}{r}$$

In order to tackle the second integral I tried to use the law of cosines and stipulate that ##\mathbf{r}## is directed along the z-axis. I included the pictures of my work.

$$\int_{0}^{2\pi }d\phi \int_{0}^{\pi }\sin\theta d\theta \int_{0}^{\infty }\frac{\lambda ^2e^{-\lambda r'}}{r'\left \| \mathbf{r-r'} \right \|}r'^2dr'\rightarrow \int_{0}^{2\pi }d\phi\int_{0}^{\infty }\int_{0}^{\pi }\frac{\lambda ^2r'e^{-\lambda r'}}{(r^2+r'^2-2rr'\cos\theta )^{1/2}}\sin\theta d\theta dr'$$

Given that ##\int_{0}^{2\pi }d\phi =2\pi ##

The problem was evaluation of the integral

$$\int_{0}^{\infty }\int_{0}^{\pi }\frac{\lambda ^2r'e^{-\lambda r'}}{(r^2+r'^2-2rr'\cos\theta )^{1/2}}\sin\theta d\theta dr'$$$$\int_{0}^{\infty }\int_{0}^{\pi }\frac{\lambda ^2r'e^{-\lambda r'}}{(r^2+r'^2-2rr'\cos\theta )^{1/2}}\sin\theta d\theta dr'=\int_{0}^{\infty }\lambda ^2r'e^{-\lambda r}\left [ \int_{0}^{\pi }\frac{\sin\theta }{(r^2+r'^2-2rr'\cos\theta )^{1/2}}d\theta \right ]dr'$$

Using the substitution ##u=r^2+r'^2-2rr'\cos\theta##, I was able to integrate with respect to ##\theta## and arrive at

$$\int_{0}^{\infty }\lambda ^2r'e^{-\lambda r'}\times \frac{1}{rr'}\left \{ \sqrt{r'^2+r^2+2rr'}-\sqrt{r'^2+r^2-2rr'} \right \}dr'$$

$$\frac{\lambda ^2}{r}\left [ \int_{0}^{\infty }e^{-\lambda r'}\sqrt{r'^2+r^2+2rr'}dr'-\int_{0}^{\infty }e^{-\lambda r'}\sqrt{r'^2+r^2-2rr'}dr' \right ]$$

Note that I know for sure that the desired potential is

$$V(\mathbf{r})=A\frac{e^{-\lambda r}}{r}$$

However, the last integrals I arrived at, as far as I know, don't yield the answer I'm looking for. The exponential factor ends up canceling out entirely.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
image_6487327 (9).JPG

image_6487327 (10).JPG

image_6487327 (11).JPG
 
  • #3
You need to be careful with the second integral $$I_2=\int_{0}^{\infty }e^{-\lambda r'}\sqrt{r'^2+r^2-2rr'}dr'$$ Remember that you integrate from zero to infinity, in which case ##r'## can be smaller or greater than ##r##. Then depending on where ##r'## is,
$$+\sqrt{r'^2+r^2-2rr'}=+\sqrt{(r-r')^2}=
\begin{cases}
-(r-r') & \text{if } r < r' \\
+(r-r') & \text{if } r \geq r'
\end{cases}$$ which means that you need to split the integral into two, one with limits from zero to ##r## and one with limits from ##r## to infinity. The first integral does not have this wrinkle because ##+\sqrt{r'^2+r^2+2rr'}=+(r+r').##
 
  • Like
Likes cwill53, Orodruin and topsquark
  • #4
kuruman said:
You need to be careful with the second integral $$I_2=\int_{0}^{\infty }e^{-\lambda r'}\sqrt{r'^2+r^2-2rr'}dr'$$ Remember that you integrate from zero to infinity, in which case ##r'## can be smaller or greater than ##r##. Then depending on where ##r'## is,
$$+\sqrt{r'^2+r^2-2rr'}=+\sqrt{(r-r')^2}=
\begin{cases}
-(r-r') & \text{if } r < r' \\
+(r-r') & \text{if } r \geq r'
\end{cases}$$ which means that you need to split the integral into two, one with limits from zero to ##r## and one with limits from ##r## to infinity. The first integral does not have this wrinkle because ##+\sqrt{r'^2+r^2+2rr'}=+(r+r').##
Thank you so much.
 
  • #5
kuruman said:
You need to be careful with the second integral $$I_2=\int_{0}^{\infty }e^{-\lambda r'}\sqrt{r'^2+r^2-2rr'}dr'$$ Remember that you integrate from zero to infinity, in which case ##r'## can be smaller or greater than ##r##. Then depending on where ##r'## is,
$$+\sqrt{r'^2+r^2-2rr'}=+\sqrt{(r-r')^2}=
\begin{cases}
-(r-r') & \text{if } r < r' \\
+(r-r') & \text{if } r \geq r'
\end{cases}$$ which means that you need to split the integral into two, one with limits from zero to ##r## and one with limits from ##r## to infinity. The first integral does not have this wrinkle because ##+\sqrt{r'^2+r^2+2rr'}=+(r+r').##
I'm wondering how I should answer part (c) of this question to get something equivalent to the original charge density divided by the vacuum permittivity for the divergence of the electric field.

After taking your advice, I got that

$$V(\mathbf{r})=A\frac{e^{-\lambda r}}{r}$$

$$\mathbf{E}=-\nabla V=-\hat{\mathbf{r}}\frac{\partial V}{\partial r}(r)=A\frac{e^{-\lambda r}}{r^2}(\lambda r+1)\hat{\mathbf{r}}$$

$$\nabla\cdot \mathbf{E}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial }{\partial r}(r^2E_r)=\frac{A}{r^2}\frac{\partial }{\partial r}\left ( \frac{r^2}{r^2}e^{-\lambda r} (\lambda r+1)\right )=-A\frac{\lambda ^2e^{-\lambda r}}{r}$$

But the original charge density is

$$\rho (r)=\epsilon _0A\left [ 4\pi \delta ^3(\mathbf{r})- \frac{\lambda ^2}{r}e^{-\lambda r}\right ]$$
 
  • #6
cwill53 said:
$$\nabla\cdot \mathbf{E}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial }{\partial r}(r^2E_r)=\frac{A}{r^2}\frac{\partial }{\partial r}\left ( \frac{r^2}{r^2}e^{-\lambda r} (\lambda r+1)\right )=-A\frac{\lambda ^2e^{-\lambda r}}{r}$$
You are missing the delta function which is zero everywhere except at the origin. Your expression for the divergence is good except at the origin. Is ##\dfrac{r^2}{r^2}=1## at ##r=0##? I think not.
 
  • Like
Likes cwill53
  • #7
kuruman said:
You are missing the delta function which is zero everywhere except at the origin. Your expression for the divergence is good except at the origin. Is ##\dfrac{r^2}{r^2}=1## at ##r=0##? I think not.
Right, right, thanks a ton.
 

1. What is electrostatic potential?

Electrostatic potential is the amount of work needed to move a unit positive charge from one point to another in an electric field. It is also known as electric potential or voltage.

2. How is electrostatic potential calculated?

Electrostatic potential is calculated using the formula V = kQ/r, where V is the potential, k is the Coulomb constant, Q is the charge, and r is the distance from the charge.

3. What is volume charge density?

Volume charge density is the amount of charge per unit volume in a given region. It is denoted by the symbol ρ and is measured in coulombs per cubic meter (C/m³).

4. How is volume charge density related to electrostatic potential?

Volume charge density is one of the factors that affects the electrostatic potential. The potential is directly proportional to the volume charge density, meaning that an increase in charge density will result in an increase in potential.

5. Can electrostatic potential be negative?

Yes, electrostatic potential can be negative. This indicates that the direction of the electric field is opposite to the direction of the positive charge. It is also possible for the potential to be zero, which means there is no electric field present.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
64
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
861
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
401
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
305
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
575
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
815
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top