Calculate the electric field at a given point

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a specific point due to a charged annulus, characterized by an interior radius a and an exterior radius b. Participants are exploring the integration of the electric field contributions from differential elements of the annulus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to integrate the electric field contributions from small differential annuli, questioning the relationship between charge and electric field. Some suggest using symmetry to simplify the problem, while others express confusion about how to incorporate angles and components into their calculations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to set up the integrals needed for calculating the electric field. Some participants have offered guidance on considering symmetry and the vertical components of the electric field, while others are still grappling with the integration process and the role of angles in their calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to revisit course material and clarify concepts related to electric fields and integration, indicating a potential gap in understanding the application of these principles in the context of the problem.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


The picture describes the situation. I want to find the electric field at point P.
The charged part is a part of an annulus with interior radius a and exterior radius b.


Homework Equations


None given.



The Attempt at a Solution



I think I must integrate the electric field produced by small (differential) annulus from a to b. Wouldn't the electric field of one of them be [tex]\sigma A[/tex] where A is the area of such an annulus?
[tex]A=\pi ((a+dx)^2-a^2)\cdot \frac{\alpha}{\pi}[/tex] for the first annulus; [tex]\alpha[/tex] is the angulus shown in the figure.
 

Attachments

  • escanear0001.jpg
    escanear0001.jpg
    62 KB · Views: 527
Physics news on Phys.org
fluidistic said:
I think I must integrate the electric field produced by small (differential) annulus from a to b. Wouldn't the electric field of one of them be [tex]\sigma A[/tex] where A is the area of such an annulus?

[tex]\sigma A[/tex] (or rather, [tex]\sigma dA[/tex]) is the charge of each differential annulus, not the electric field. Remember that E=kQ/r^2, so you'll have to integrate to find the electric field due to each tiny annulus.
 
ideasrule said:
[tex]\sigma A[/tex] (or rather, [tex]\sigma dA[/tex]) is the charge of each differential annulus, not the electric field. Remember that E=kQ/r^2, so you'll have to integrate to find the electric field due to each tiny annulus.

You're right! I need to reread my whole course quickly!
Thanks. I'll post my attempt as soon as I can.
 
I think you might be able to simplify your problem by using the inherent symmetry of the shape. Draw a line vertically through the diagram bisecting the annulus. Now consider the electric field from two bits of charge on the annulus that are located symmetrically with respect to the line and are the same distance from point P. Two of the components of the electric field at P due to these dQ's cancel, and two components add. You might want to set up a double integral that expresses this cancellation (by introducing a cosine term to project the electric field onto the vertical line) and where you represent your charge, dQ, as a little piece [tex]\sigma r d\theta dr[/tex]. Then integrate from r = a to r = b and from [tex]\theta = -\alpha to \alpha[/tex].

There's another small simplification you could make to the limits in the integral due to the symmetry, though it's not necessary.
 
AEM said:
I think you might be able to simplify your problem by using the inherent symmetry of the shape. Draw a line vertically through the diagram bisecting the annulus. Now consider the electric field from two bits of charge on the annulus that are located symmetrically with respect to the line and are the same distance from point P. Two of the components of the electric field at P due to these dQ's cancel, and two components add. You might want to set up a double integral that expresses this cancellation (by introducing a cosine term to project the electric field onto the vertical line) and where you represent your charge, dQ, as a little piece [tex]\sigma r d\theta dr[/tex]. Then integrate from r = a to r = b and from [tex]\theta = -\alpha to \alpha[/tex].

There's another small simplification you could make to the limits in the integral due to the symmetry, though it's not necessary.

I've tried your way since I made an error via my way.
If I understand you well, the double integral gives you the total charge of the annulus, but how does it matter for calculating the electric field?
I did a sketch, I realize that the horizontal components of the small dQ on each side of the vertical line cancels out. And that the vertical sum up, but I don't realize this with my draft, rather by intuition.
So [tex]dQ=\sigma dA[/tex], but thanks to calculus III we have that [tex]dA=rd\theta dr[/tex] in polar coordinates, ok I follow you. Hence [tex]Q=\int_a ^b \int _{-\alpha}^{\alpha} \sigma r d \theta d r=\sigma \alpha (b^2-a^2)[/tex].
I really need to reread my whole course...
While doing so, could you please help me a bit more?
Thanks anyway!
 
fluidistic said:
I've tried your way since I made an error via my way.
If I understand you well, the double integral gives you the total charge of the annulus, but how does it matter for calculating the electric field?
I did a sketch, I realize that the horizontal components of the small dQ on each side of the vertical line cancels out. And that the vertical sum up, but I don't realize this with my draft, rather by intuition.
So [tex]dQ=\sigma dA[/tex], but thanks to calculus III we have that [tex]dA=rd\theta dr[/tex] in polar coordinates, ok I follow you. Hence [tex]Q=\int_a ^b \int _{-\alpha}^{\alpha} \sigma r d \theta d r=\sigma \alpha (b^2-a^2)[/tex].
I really need to reread my whole course...
While doing so, could you please help me a bit more?
Thanks anyway!

You're on the right track BUT and this is a big BUT! You actually have to calculate the magnitude of the electric field component in the vertical direction. Remember that the dE from each bit of charge dQ is pointing at an angle from the vertical. So you don't want to compute the total charge as you did, but you need to set up the integral to compute the total electric field as in

[tex]E = \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{r^2} cos(\theta) dQ[/tex]

Where dQ is your expression above (and my integral sign stands for your two definite integral signs).

So you will need the cosine term in your expression as well. The theta is the angle between the electri field vector and the vertical.

When I did your problem, I ended up with a [tex]sin( \alpha)[/tex] and a [tex]ln(\frac{b}{a} )[/tex] in the answer.
 
I'm sorry, I don't know why I can't do this exercise.
I've tried again and again.
I am restarting...
[tex]dQ=\sigma dA=\sigma r dr d \theta[/tex].
[tex]d\vec E = \frac{kdQ \hat r}{r^2}=\frac{k\sigma dr d\theta}{r}\hat r[/tex].
Now this is where I'm stuck.
I know that [tex]\hat r[/tex] points from the [tex]dA[/tex] element to the point P and that its magnitude is 1 but it is multiplied by a scalar (namely [tex]\frac{k\sigma dr d\theta}{r}[/tex]) so I've no idea about how to plug the [tex]\cos \theta[/tex] term in the formula of [tex]d\vec E[/tex]. Although I realize that the electric field at P only has a vertical component which is the sum of all the vertical components of the dA elements...
Can you help me once again, please? (By the way I also understand the limits of integration, I'm just stuck on how to introduce the [tex]\cos \theta[/tex] term; for now at least).
Thank you for having helped me so far.
 
fluidistic said:
I'm sorry, I don't know why I can't do this exercise.
I've tried again and again.
I am restarting...
[tex]dQ=\sigma dA=\sigma r dr d \theta[/tex].
[tex]d\vec E = \frac{kdQ \hat r}{r^2}=\frac{k\sigma dr d\theta}{r}\hat r[/tex].
Now this is where I'm stuck.
I know that [tex]\hat r[/tex] points from the [tex]dA[/tex] element to the point P and that its magnitude is 1 but it is multiplied by a scalar (namely [tex]\frac{k\sigma dr d\theta}{r}[/tex]) so I've no idea about how to plug the [tex]\cos \theta[/tex] term in the formula of [tex]d\vec E[/tex]. Although I realize that the electric field at P only has a vertical component which is the sum of all the vertical components of the dA elements...
Can you help me once again, please? (By the way I also understand the limits of integration, I'm just stuck on how to introduce the [tex]\cos \theta[/tex] term; for now at least).
Thank you for having helped me so far.

No problem.Here's the deal: as long as you have the unit vector r-hat in there your dE is a vector. But since you have already realized that one (the horizontal) component of the dE vectors cancel out, what you want to do is add up the other components --the vertical ones. You get them by dropping the unit r-hat vector and multiplying your expression by cos(theta) where theta is the angle between the vector dE and the vertical. It's that simple. Think back to when you first learned about vectors and they asked you "What is the x component of this vector? What is the y component of that vector? You took the length of the vector and multiplied it by the appropriate sine or cosine. Here I'm telling you it's cos(theta) as defined earlier.
 
AEM said:
No problem.Here's the deal: as long as you have the unit vector r-hat in there your dE is a vector. But since you have already realized that one (the horizontal) component of the dE vectors cancel out, what you want to do is add up the other components --the vertical ones. You get them by dropping the unit r-hat vector and multiplying your expression by cos(theta) where theta is the angle between the vector dE and the vertical. It's that simple. Think back to when you first learned about vectors and they asked you "What is the x component of this vector? What is the y component of that vector? You took the length of the vector and multiplied it by the appropriate sine or cosine. Here I'm telling you it's cos(theta) as defined earlier.

Thanks a lot!
I've reached [tex]E=2k\sigma \ln \left( \frac{b}{a} \right ) \sin (\alpha)[/tex]. I don't know if it's the right result, but at least it makes sense if [tex]\alpha=\pi[/tex] or 0.

Thank you very much for all, you've been extremely helpful to me. Very nice explanations.
 
  • #10
That looks like what I got. You're very welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K